Deterministic policies based on maximum regrets in MDPs with imprecise rewards

Author:

Alizadeh Pegah1,Traversi Emiliano2,Osmani Aomar2

Affiliation:

1. Léonard de Vinci Pôle Universitaire, Research Center, 92 916 Paris, La Défense, France. E-mail: pegah.alizadeh@devinci.fr

2. LIPN-UMR CNRS 7030, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, France. E-mails: emiliano.traversi@lipn.univ-paris13.fr, aomar.osmani@lipn.univ-paris13.fr

Abstract

Markov Decision Process Models (MDPs) are a powerful tool for planning tasks and sequential decision-making issues. In this work we deal with MDPs with imprecise rewards, often used when dealing with situations where the data is uncertain. In this context, we provide algorithms for finding the policy that minimizes the maximum regret. To the best of our knowledge, all the regret-based methods proposed in the literature focus on providing an optimal stochastic policy. We introduce for the first time a method to calculate an optimal deterministic policy using optimization approaches. Deterministic policies are easily interpretable for users because for a given state they provide a unique choice. To better motivate the use of an exact procedure for finding a deterministic policy, we show some (theoretical and experimental) cases where the intuitive idea of using a deterministic policy obtained after “determinizing” the optimal stochastic policy leads to a policy far from the exact deterministic policy.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Artificial Intelligence

Reference24 articles.

1. Sampling based approaches for minimizing regret in uncertain Markov decision processes (MDPs);Ahmed;J. Artif. Intell. Res.,2017

2. Advantage based value iteration for Markov decision processes with unknown rewards

3. P. Alizadeh, Y. Chevaleyre and J. Zucker, Approximate regret based elicitation in Markov decision process, in: RIVF, IEEE, 2015, pp. 47–52.

4. Regret in decision making under uncertainty;Bell;Operations Research,1982

5. F. Benavent and B. Zanuttini, An experimental study of advice in sequential decision-making under uncertainty, in: 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3