Use of Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease Risk in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Subjective Cognitive Decline in Routine Clinical Care in Germany

Author:

Bartels Claudia1,Kögel Anna2,Schweda Mark23,Wiltfang Jens145,Pentzek Michael6,Schicktanz Silke2,Schneider Anja78

Affiliation:

1. Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany

2. Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany

3. Department of Health Services Research, School for Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

4. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany

5. iBiMED, Medical Sciences Department, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

6. Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany

7. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany

8. Department for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, 7 Bonn, Germany

Abstract

Background: The National Institute of Aging and Alzheimer’s Association’s diagnostic recommendations for preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) define AD by pathological processes which can be detected by biomarkers. These criteria were established as part of a research framework intended for research purposes but progressively enter the clinical practice. Objective: We investigated the availability, frequency of use, interpretation, and therapeutic implications of biomarkers for the etiologic diagnosis and prognosis in MCI and subjective cognitive decline (SCD) in routine clinical care. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey among 215 expert dementia centers (hospitals and memory clinics) in Germany. Results: From the 98 centers (45.6% of contacted centers) included, two-thirds reported use of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers Aβ42, tau, and phospho-tau in the diagnostic workup of MCI and one third in SCD. CSF biomarker analysis was more often employed by neurological (MCI 84%; SCD 42%) compared to psychiatric institutions (MCI 61%; SCD 33%; p≤0.001). Although dementia experts disagreed on the risk of progression associated with different CSF biomarker constellations, CSF biomarker results guided therapeutic decisions: ∼40% of responders reported to initiate cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in MCI and 18% in SCD (p = 0.006), given that all CSF biomarkers were in the pathological range. Conclusion: Considering the vast heterogeneity among dementia expert centers in use of CSF biomarker analysis, interpretation of results, and therapeutic consequences, a standardization of biomarker-based diagnosis practice in pre-dementia stages is needed.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3