Skin dose measurement and estimating the dosimetric effect of applicator misplacement in gynecological brachytherapy: A patient and phantom study

Author:

Majdaeen Mehrsa1,Dorri-Giv Masoumeh2,Olfat Shaghayegh3,Ataei Gholamreza4,Abedi-Firouzjah Razzagh5,Banaei Amin6,Ranjbar Sahar7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

2. Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3. Department of Medical Radiation, Engineering Faculty, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4. Department of Radiology Technology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Babol University of Medical Science, Babol, Iran

5. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran

6. Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

7. Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate skin dose differences between TPS (treatment planning system) calculations and TLD (thermo-luminescent dosimeters) measurements along with the dosimetric effect of applicator misplacement for patients diagnosed with gynecological (GYN) cancers undergoing brachytherapy. METHODS: The skin doses were measured using TLDs attached in different locations on patients’ skin in pelvic regions (anterior, left, and right) for 20 patients, as well as on a phantom. In addition, the applicator surface dose was calculated with TLDs attached to the applicator. The measured doses were compared with TPS calculations to find TPS accuracy. For the phantom, different applicator shifts were applied to find the effect of applicator misplacement on the surface dose. RESULTS: The mean absolute dose differences between the TPS and TLDs results for anterior, left, and right points were 3.14±1.03, 6.25±1.88, and 6.20±1.97 %, respectively. The mean difference on the applicator surface was obtained 1.92±0.46 %. Applicator misplacements of 0.5, 2, and 4 cm (average of three locations) resulted in 9, 36, and 61%, dose errors respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The surface/skin differences between the calculations and measurements are higher in the left and right regions, which relate to the higher uncertainty of TPS dose calculation in these regions. Furthermore, applicator misplacements can result in high skin dose variations, therefore it can be an appropriate quality assurance method for future research.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Condensed Matter Physics,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Radiation

Reference23 articles.

1. Polycystic ovary syndrome and the risk of gynaecological cancer: a systematic review;Chittenden;Reprod Biomed Online,2009

2. Worldwide burden of gynaecological cancer: the size of the problem;Sankaranarayanan;Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2006

3. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions;Baskar;Int J Med Sci,2012

4. Dosimetric measurement of scattered radiation for simulated head and neck radiotherapy with homemade oral phantom;Li;J Xray Sci Technol,2020

5. Monte Carlo modeling of 60Co HDR brachytherapy source in water and in different solid water phantom materials;Sahoo;J Med Physics Association Med Phys India,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3