Reasoning and interaction for social artificial intelligence

Author:

Black Elizabeth1,Brandão Martim1,Cocarascu Oana1,De Keijzer Bart1,Du Yali1,Long Derek1,Luck Michael1,McBurney Peter1,Meroño-Peñuela Albert1,Miles Simon1,Modgil Sanjay1,Moreau Luc1,Polukarov Maria1,Rodrigues Odinaldo1,Ventre Carmine1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Informatics, King’s College London, Bush House, 30 Aldwych, London WC2B 4BG, United Kingdom

Abstract

Current work on multi-agent systems at King’s College London is extensive, though largely based in two research groups within the Department of Informatics: the Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI) thematic group and the Reasoning & Planning (RAP) thematic group. DAI combines AI expertise with political and economic theories and data, to explore social and technological contexts of interacting intelligent entities. It develops computational models for analysing social, political and economic phenomena to improve the effectiveness and fairness of policies and regulations, and combines intelligent agent systems, software engineering, norms, trust and reputation, agent-based simulation, communication and provenance of data, knowledge engineering, crowd computing and semantic technologies, and algorithmic game theory and computational social choice, to address problems arising in autonomous systems, financial markets, privacy and security, urban living and health. RAP conducts research in symbolic models for reasoning involving argumentation, knowledge representation, planning, and other related areas, including development of logical models of argumentation-based reasoning and decision-making, and their usage for explainable AI and integration of machine and human reasoning, as well as combining planning and argumentation methodologies for strategic argumentation.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Artificial Intelligence

Reference105 articles.

1. An evolutionary approach to norms;Axelrod;The American Political Science Review,1986

2. Forgetting an Argument

3. E. Black and K. Atkinson, Choosing persuasive arguments for action, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2011, pp. 849–856.

4. E. Black, A.J. Coles and C. Hampson, Planning for persuasion, in: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 2017, pp. 933–942.

5. An inquiry dialogue system;Black;Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems,2009

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3