Is There A Benefit of Restaging Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor Prior to Radical Cystectomy With or Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the best predictors of positive outcomes in bladder cancer (BC) is pT0 following radical cystectomy (RC). Discordance between clinical and pathologic staging affects decision-making in patients with clinical absence of disease (cT0). OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether a restaging transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT) improves clinical staging accuracy relative to pathologic stage RC in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) versus those who did not receive NAC. METHODS: We queried our prospectively maintained IRB approved institutional database to identify 129 patients who underwent RC from 2013 to 2019 with a re-TURBT prior to RC. 53 patients were treated with NAC between their initial and re-TURBT and 76 patients were not treated with NAC. RESULTS: The overall upstaging rate from re-TURBT to RC was 34.9%. There was no significant difference in the upstaging rate between the NAC and no-NAC groups - 31.0% vs. 37.0%, respectively. In patients who were cT0 on re-TURBT, the NAC group did not show a significantly greater rate of pathologic clinical CR (pT0) than the no NAC group - 38.5% vs. 37.5%, respectively. Re-TURBT with staging < rT2 as a predictor for absence of MIBC on pathologic staging (<ypT2) did not show a significant difference between the NAC and no NAC group, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 69.0% and 66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Re-TURBT after NAC does not show statistically significant improvement in staging accuracy relative to pathologic stage at RC compared to re-TURBT in patients not treated with NAC.