New scoring system to reduce unfairness in men’s doubles

Author:

Pollard Graham1,Noble Ken1,Pollard Geoff1

Affiliation:

1. 2/38 Girrahween St, Braddon, ACT 2612, ACT, Australia

Abstract

Tennis uses essentially the same scoring system in doubles as in singles. In this paper it is shown that the scoring system commonly used in men’s doubles has the potential to be unfair. Aspects of this potential unfairness are identified and methods for reducing it are outlined. The statistical characteristics of the present scoring system are compared with those of a proposed new system.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference6 articles.

1. Symmetric sequential analysis: the efficiencies of sports scoring systems (with particular reference to those of tennis);Miles;Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B,1984

2. An analysis of classical and tiebreaker tennis;Pollard;Australian Journal of Statistics,1983

3. Measuring excitement in sport;Pollard;Journal of Sports Analytics,2017

4. The relationship of excitement, importance and entropy to the efficiency of statistical hypothesis tests;Pollard;Journal of Sports Analytics,2017

5. The potential for reducing the length of very long tennis matches;Pollard;Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3