Domain-Independent Design Theory and Methodology to Boost the Adoption of Design Methods

Author:

Borgianni Yuri1,Dixon Brian2,Ekwaro-Osire Stephen3,Nespoli Oscar4,Summers Joshua5,Wan Thomas T.H.6,Zeng Yong7

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy

2. Belfast School of Art, Ulster University, Belfast, UK

3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

4. Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA

6. School of Global Health Management and Informatics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

7. Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada

Abstract

Since its inception, research on design methods has encompassed a number of objectives and fields. In this fragmentary and evolving landscape, a reflection was apparently needed on the chance to provide a general framework and understand the progress (if any) towards a unified and domain-independent design theory and methodology. The issue was discussed by the authors, among the others, during a workshop organized by the Society of Design and Process Science. The paper reports the most important points that emerged in the debate, which was kicked off by panellists’ talks providing different perspectives on domain-independent design and the adoption of design methods by industry and practitioners. The discussion highlighted the relevance of design education, individual factors, as well as the role of designers in nowadays’ changing world. A major take-away from the workshop is the forecast that, in the foreseeable future, a shared design knowledge will be developed, but this will be juxtaposed by peculiar and bespoke design practices.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

General Engineering

Reference32 articles.

1. Data-driven modeling of technology acceptance: A machine learning perspective;Alwabel,;Expert Systems With Applications,2021

2. Product Planning techniques: Investigating the differences between research trajectories and industry expectations;Bacciotti,;Research in Engineering Design,2016

3. Boisot, M.H. (1995). Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions, and Culture. London: Routledge.

4. Investigating the patterns of value-oriented innovations in blue ocean strategy;Borgianni,;International Journal of Innovation Science,2012

5. Investigating the future of the fuzzy front end: Towards a change of paradigm in the very early design phases?;Borgianni,;Journal of Engineering Design,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3