Effectiveness of robot-assisted arm therapy in stroke rehabilitation: An overview of systematic reviews-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Effectiveness of robot-assisted arm therapy in stroke rehabilitation: An overview of systematic reviews

Published:2022-12-27 Issue:4 Volume:51 Page:559-576
ISSN:1053-8135
Container-title:NeuroRehabilitation
language:
Short-container-title:NRE

Author:

Straudi Sofia¹,Baluardo Ludovica¹,Arienti Chiara²,Bozzolan Michela³,Lazzarini Stefano G.²,Agostini Michela⁴,Aprile Irene⁵,Paci Matteo⁶,Casanova Emanuela⁷,Marino Dario⁸,La Rosa Giuseppe⁹,Bressi Federica¹⁰,Sterzi Silvia¹⁰,Giansanti Daniele¹¹,Perrero Luca¹²,Battistini Alberto⁷,Miccinilli Sandra¹⁰,Filoni Serena¹³,Sicari Monica¹⁴,Petrozzino Salvatore¹⁴,Solaro Claudio Marcello¹⁵,Gargano Stefano¹⁶,Benanti Paolo¹⁷,Boldrini Paolo¹⁸,Bonaiuti Donatella¹⁹,Castelli Enrico²⁰,Draicchio Francesco²¹,Falabella Vincenzo²²,Galeri Silvia²,Gimigliano Francesca²³,Grigioni Mauro¹¹,Mazzoleni Stefano²⁴,Mazzon Stefano²⁵,Molteni Franco²⁶,Petrarca Maurizio²⁷,Picelli Alessandro²⁸,Posteraro Federico²⁹,Senatore Michele³⁰,Turchetti Giuseppe³¹,Morone Giovanni³²,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Ferrara University, Ferrara, Italy

2. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy

3. Interdepartmental Educational Service, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. Anna Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

4. San Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy

5. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy

6. AUSL (Unique Sanitary Local Company) District of Central Tuscany, Florence, Italy

7. IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

8. IRCCS Neurolysis Center “Bonino Pulejo”, Messina, Italy

9. Consorzio Siciliano di Riabilitazione (CSR), Catania, Italy

10. Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital Foundation, Rome, Italy

11. National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy

12. Neurorehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy

13. Padre Pio Onlus Rehabilitation Centers Foundation, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

14. A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy

15. CRRF “Mons. Luigi Novarese”, Vercelli, Italy

16. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Turin, Italy

17. Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome, Italy

18. Società Italiana di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa (SIMFER), Rome, Italy

19. Istituto Geriatrico Piero Redaelli, Milan, Italy

20. Department of Paediatric Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital,, Rome, Italy

21. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Rome, Italy

22. Italian Federation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries (Faip Onlus), Rome, Italy

23. Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy

24. Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

25. AULSS6 (Unique Sanitary Local Company), Euganea Padova - Distretto 4 “Alta Padovana”, Padua, Italy

26. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Lecco, Italy

27. Movement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory (MARlab), IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy

28. Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

29. Department of Rehabilitation, Versilia Hospital – AUSL12, Viareggio, Italy

30. Associazione Italiana dei Terapisti Occupazionali (AITO), Rome, Italy

31. Management Institute, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy

32. Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted arm therapy (RAT) has been used mainly in stroke rehabilitation in the last 20 years with rising expectations and growing evidence summarized in systematic reviews (SRs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide an overview of SRs about the effectiveness, within the ICF domains, and safety of RAT in the rehabilitation of adult with stroke compared to other treatments. METHODS: The search strategy was conducted using search strings adapted explicitly for each database. A screening base on title and abstract was realized to find all the potentially relevant studies. The methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed using AMSTAR-2. A pre-determined standardized form was used to realize the data extraction. RESULTS: 18 SRs were included in this overview. Generally, positive effects from the RAT were found for motor function and muscle strength, whereas there is no agreement for muscle tone effects. No effect was found for pain, and only a SR reported the positive impact of RAT in daily living activity. CONCLUSION: RAT can be considered a valuable option to increase motor function and muscle strength after stroke. However, the poor quality of most of the included SRs could limit the certainty around the results.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference50 articles.

1. Rehabilitation methods for reducing shoulder subluxation in post-stroke hemiparesis: A systematic review;Arya,;Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation,2018

2. The benefits and challenges of conducting an overview of systematic reviews in public health: A focus on physical activity;Baker,;Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England),2014

3. Interrater reliability of grading strength of evidence varies with the complexity of the evidence in systematic reviews;Berkman,;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2013

4. The relationship between upper limb activity and impairment in post-stroke hemiplegia;Burridge,;Disability and Rehabilitation,2009

5. Self-directed therapy programmes for arm rehabilitation after stroke: A systematic review;Da-Silva,;Clinical Rehabilitation,2018

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Robot-Assisted Framework for Rehabilitation Practices: Implementation and Experimental Results;Sensors;2023-09-04

2. Preferences for Rehabilitation in Persons with a History of Stroke: A Discrete Choice Experiment;Patient Preference and Adherence;2023-07

3. Robotically driven Error Augmentation training enhances post‐stroke arm motor recovery;Engineering Reports;2023-06-27

4. A Multiaxial Rehabilitation Programme for Workers with COVID-19 Sequelae Using a Conventional and Technological-Robotic Approach: The Proposal of INAIL and Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi;Healthcare;2023-05-30

5. Effects of Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation Compared with Conventional Therapy in Patients with Stroke: Preliminary Results on a Daily Task Assessed Using Motion Analysis;Sensors;2023-03-13