Effects of robotic upper limb treatment after stroke on cognitive patterns: A systematic review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Effects of robotic upper limb treatment after stroke on cognitive patterns: A systematic review

Published:2022-12-27 Issue:4 Volume:51 Page:541-558
ISSN:1053-8135
Container-title:NeuroRehabilitation
language:
Short-container-title:NRE

Author:

Bressi Federica¹,Cricenti Laura¹,Campagnola Benedetta¹,Bravi Marco¹,Miccinilli Sandra¹,Santacaterina Fabio¹,Sterzi Silvia¹,Straudi Sofia²,Agostini Michela³,Paci Matteo⁴,Casanova Emanuela⁵,Marino Dario⁶,La Rosa Giuseppe⁷,Giansanti Daniele⁸,Perrero Luca⁹,Battistini Alberto⁵,Filoni Serena¹⁰,Sicari Monica¹¹,Petrozzino Salvatore¹¹,Solaro Claudio Marcello¹²,Gargano Stefano¹³,Benanti Paolo¹⁴,Boldrini Paolo¹⁵,Bonaiuti Donatella¹⁶,Castelli Enrico¹⁷,Draicchio Francesco¹⁸,Falabella Vincenzo¹⁹,Galeri Silvia²⁰,Gimigliano Francesca²¹,Grigioni Mauro⁸,Mazzoleni Stefano²²,Mazzon Stefano²³,Molteni Franco²⁴,Petrarca Maurizio²⁵,Picelli Alessandro²⁶,Posteraro Federico²⁷,Senatore Michele²⁸,Turchetti Giuseppe²⁹,Morone Giovanni³⁰,Gallotti Marco³¹,Germanotta Marco³¹,Aprile Irene³¹,

Affiliation:

1. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy

2. Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Ferrara University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy

3. San Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy

4. AUSL (Unique Sanitary Local Company) District of Central Tuscany, Florence, Italy

5. Unità Operativa di Medicina Riabilitativa e Neuroriabilitazione (SC), IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

6. IRCCS Neurolysis Center “Bonino Pulejo”, Messina, Italy

7. C.S.R. – Consorzio Siciliano di Riabilitazione, Catania, Italy

8. National Center for Innovative Technologies in Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy

9. Neurorehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy

10. Padre Pio Onlus Rehabilitation Centers Foundation, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

11. A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy

12. CRRF “Mons. Luigi Novarese”, Vercelli, Italy

13. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Turin, Italy

14. Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome, Italy

15. Società Italiana di Medicina Fisica e Riabilitativa (SIMFER), Rome, Italy

16. Istituto Geriatrico Piero Redaelli, Milan, Italy

17. Department of Paediatric Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy

18. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Rome, Italy

19. Italian Federation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injuries (Faip Onlus), Rome, Italy

20. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy

21. Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy

22. Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Politecnico di Bari, Bari, Italy

23. AULSS6 (Unique Sanitary Local Company) Euganea Padova – Distretto 4 “Alta Padovana”, Padua, Italy

24. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Valduce Hospital, Lecco, Italy

25. Movement Analysis and Robotics Laboratory (MARlab), IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Rome, Italy

26. Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

27. Department of Rehabilitation, Versilia Hospital – AUSL12, Viareggio, Italy

28. Associazione Italiana dei Terapisti Occupazionali (AITO), Rome, Italy

29. Management Institute, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy

30. University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy

31. IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic therapy (RT) has been internationally recognized for the motor rehabilitation of the upper limb. Although it seems that RT can stimulate and promote neuroplasticity, the effectiveness of robotics in restoring cognitive deficits has been considered only in a few recent studies. OBJECTIVE: To verify whether, in the current state of the literature, cognitive measures are used as inclusion or exclusion criteria and/or outcomes measures in robotic upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies eligible were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to March 2021. RESULTS: Eighty-one studies were considered in this systematic review. Seventy-three studies have at least a cognitive inclusion or exclusion criteria, while only seven studies assessed cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite the high presence of cognitive instruments used for inclusion/exclusion criteria their heterogeneity did not allow the identification of a guideline for the evaluation of patients in different stroke stages. Therefore, although the heterogeneity and the low percentage of studies that included cognitive outcomes, seemed that the latter were positively influenced by RT in post-stroke rehabilitation. Future larger RCTs are needed to outline which cognitive scales are most suitable and their cut-off, as well as what cognitive outcome measures to use in the various stages of post-stroke rehabilitation.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference120 articles.

1. Abdullah H.A. , Tarry C. , Lambert C. , Barreca S. , & Allen B.O. (2011). Results of clinicians using a therapeutic robotic system inan inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 8(1).

2. Adomavicienė A. , Daunoravicienė K. , Kubilius R. , Varzaitytė L. , & Raistenskis J. (2019). Influence of New Technologies on Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: A Comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect System. Medicina (Kaunas) [Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 17];55(4). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30970655/

3. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke;Aisen;Arch Neurol [Internet],1997

4. Perceptuo-motor planning during functional reaching after stroke;Alt Murphy;Exp Brain Res [Internet],2017

5. A Robotic System with EMG-Triggered Functional Eletrical Stimulation for Restoring Arm Functions inStroke Survivors;Ambrosini;Neurorehabil Neural Repair [Internet],2021

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Effect of bimanual sensor glove and unimanual robot-assisted therapy for upper limb function after stroke;Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie;2024-04-30

2. Synergy-based functional electrical stimulation and robotic-assisted for retraining reach-to-grasp in stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial;BMC Neurology;2023-09-12

3. A Multiaxial Rehabilitation Programme for Workers with COVID-19 Sequelae Using a Conventional and Technological-Robotic Approach: The Proposal of INAIL and Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi;Healthcare;2023-05-30

4. New Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Electromyography-Driven Robot Hand for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation of Patients With Stroke: A Randomized, Controlled Trial;Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair;2023-04-11