Becoming a research participant: Decision-making needs of individuals with neuromuscular diseases

Author:

Gauthier Véronique1,Poitras Marie-Eve2,Lavoie Mélissa3,Gallais Benjamin4,Muslemani Samar51,Boivin Michel1,Tremblay Marc1,Gagnon Cynthia51

Affiliation:

1. Groupe de Recherche Interdisciplinaire sur les Maladies Neuromusculaires, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean, Jonquière, QC, Canada

2. Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine FMSS-University of Sherbrooke, Saguenay, QC, Canada

3. Department of Health Sciences, University of Quebec at Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada

4. ÉCOBES - Research and Transfer, Cégep de Jonquière, Saguenay, QC, Canada

5. School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Saguenay, QC, Canada

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that some people with neuromuscular diseases may have a lower level of education due to lower socioeconomic status and possibly compromised health literacy. In view of these data, it appears important to document their decision-making needs to ensure better support when faced with the decision to participate or not in research projects. OBJECTIVES: 1) To document the decision-making needs of individuals with neuromuscular diseases to participate in research; 2) To explore their preferences regarding the format of knowledge translation tools related to research participation. METHODS: This qualitative study is based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. A two-step descriptive study was conducted to capture the decision-making needs of people with neuromuscular diseases related to research participation: 1) Individual semi-directed interviews (with people with neuromuscular diseases) and focus groups (with healthcare professionals); 2) Synthesis of the literature. RESULTS: The semi-directed interviews (n = 11), the two focus groups (n = 11) and the literature synthesis (n = 50 articles) identified information needs such as learning about ongoing research projects, scientific advances and research results, the potential benefits and risks associated with different types of research projects, and identified values surrounding research participation: helping other generations, trust, obtaining better clinical follow-up, and socialization. CONCLUSION: This paper provides useful recommendations to support researchers and clinicians in developing material to inform individuals with neuromuscular diseases about research participation.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

General Medicine

Reference52 articles.

1. The correlation of CTG repeat length with material and social deprivation in myotonic dystrophy;Laberge;Clinical Genetics,2007

2. Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research;Elliott;A Handbook of Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology,2005

3. Krueger R.A. and Casey M.A. , Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, SAGE Publishing, Thousand Oaks, 2014.

4. Using NVivo for data analysis in qualitative research;AlYahmady;International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education,2013

5. Tricco A. , Antony J. and Straus S. , Systematic reviews vs. rapid reviews: What’s the difference? Canada: University of Toronto (2014).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3