Improving the visibility and communication of treatment escalation plans in Somerset NHS foundation trust

Author:

King Oliver1,Collman Emily2,Evans Alice3,Richards James4,Hughes Elin5,Acquah Lydia4,Parsons Helen4,Morrison Jo4

Affiliation:

1. Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, , UK

2. Great Weston NHS Foundation Trust, , UK

3. Wyong Hospital, , , Australia

4. Musgrove Park Hospital, , UK

5. Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, , UK

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advance care treatment escalation plans (TEPs) are often lost between healthcare settings, leading to duplication of work and loss of patient autonomy. OBJECTIVE: This quality improvement project reviewed the usage of TEP forms and aimed to improve completeness of documentation and visibility between admissions. METHODS: Over four months we monitored TEP form documentation using a standardised data extraction form. This examined section completion, seniority of documenting clinician and transfer of forms to our hospital electronic patient record (EPRO). We added reminders to computer monitors on wards to improve EPRO upload. RESULTS: Initial data demonstrated that 95% of patients (n = 230) had a TEP, with 99% of TEPs recording resuscitation status. However, other sections were not well documented (patient capacity 57% completion and personal priorities 45% completion, respectively). Only 11.9% of TEPs documented consultant involvement. Furthermore, only 44% of TEPs with a do not attempt resuscitation (DNACPR) decision were uploaded. Following this, we added reminders to computer monitors explaining how to upload TEP decisions to EPRO, which increased EPRO uploads to 74%. CONCLUSION: Communication of TEPs needs improving across healthcare settings. This project showed that the use of a physical reminder can greatly improve communication of treatment escalation decisions. Furthermore, this intervention has inspired future projects aiming at making communication more sustainable through the use of discharge summaries.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,General Medicine

Reference10 articles.

1. BMA, Resus Council (UK), RCN. Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, 3rd edn., 2016.

2. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death ‘Time to Intervene’, 2012.

3. Quality Care Commission. Protect, respect, connect—decisions about living and dying well during COVID-19, 2020.

4. Variation in local trust do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) policies: A review of 48 English healthcare trusts;Freeman;BMJ Open,2015

5. Improving documentation of treatment escalation decisions in acute care;Dahill;BMJ Quality Improvement Reports,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3