Lower oxygen saturation targets in preterm infants are not associated with increased rates of pulmonary hypertension

Author:

Niccum M.12,Spyropoulos F.32,Levin J.C.452,Petty C.R.6,Mullen M.P.72,Christou H.32

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

3. Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

5. Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

6. Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

7. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal oxygen saturation target in preterm infants is not known. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of lower oxygen saturation targets on the rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and pulmonary hypertension (PH) in preterm infants. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comparing BPD, ROP, and PH incidence among two cohorts of infants born at≤32 weeks gestation with different oxygen saturation targets at≥34 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA): cohort 1, 94–98% (n = 126); cohort 2, 92–97% (n = 121). Groups compared by Chi-square test, t-test, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: When comparing cohort 1 (average gestational age 29.8 weeks, average birth weight 1271g) with cohort 2 (average gestational age 29.6 weeks, average birth weight 1299g), there was no difference in rate of BPD (24% vs. 19%, p = 0.38), ROP (4% vs. 3%, p = 0.49), or PH (2% vs. 4%, p = 0.44). CONCLUSION: An oxygen saturation target of 92–97% at≥34 weeks PMA was not associated with a higher rate of PH or lower rate of BPD or ROP when compared with a higher target of 94–98%.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3