Ranking DMUs by using interval efficiencies in data envelopment analysis

Author:

Zhang Xing-Xian12,Liu Wenli3,Wang Xu4,Zuo Wenjin5,Wang Ying-Ming67,Sun Licheng1

Affiliation:

1. School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, P.R. China

2. School of Architecture and Engineering, Tongling University, Tongling, Anhui, P.R. China

3. School of Mathematics and Statistics, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian, P.R. China

4. School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing, Chongqing, P.R. China

5. Zhejiang College, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Jinhua, Zhejiang, P.R. China

6. Decision Sciences Institute, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian, P.R. China

7. Key Laboratory of Spatial Data Mining & Information Sharing of Ministry of Education, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou Fujian, P.R. China

Abstract

Efficiency is a relative measure that allows assessment across different ranges. Evaluating the performance of decision-making units (DMUs) from an optimistic perspective yields the best relative efficiency (optimistic efficiency), which establishes an efficiency frontier. Conversely, evaluating from a pessimistic perspective produces the worst relative efficiency (pessimistic efficiency) and creates an inefficiency frontier. This study examines the efficiency of DMUs in two scenarios and proposes models for adjustment coefficient. The pessimistic and optimistic efficiencies are adjusted to the lower and upper bounds of the DMUs based on the adjustment coefficient, enabling determination of efficiency intervals for all DMUs, as well as evaluation and ranking. A Hurwicz criterion-based approach is introduced and applied to compare and rank the interval efficiencies of DMUs. Two numerical examples are examined using the proposed DEA adjustment coefficient models to demonstrate its potential application and validity.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,General Engineering,Statistics and Probability

Reference36 articles.

1. Hybrid game cross efficiency evaluation models based on interval data: A case of forest carbon sequestration

2. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meaning and the uses;Doyle;The Journal of the Operational Research Society,1994

3. Cross-evaluation in DEA: Improving discrimination among DMUs;Doyle;INFOR,1995

4. A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension;Wang;Expert Systems with Applications,2010

5. The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium;Liang;Operations Research,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3