Author:
Urquhart Lachlan,Miranda Diana,Podoletz Lena
Abstract
In this paper, we develop the concept of smart home devices as ‘invisible witnesses’ in everyday life. We explore contemporary examples that highlight how smart devices have been used by the police and unpack the socio-technical implications of using these devices in criminal investigations. We draw on several sociological, computing and forensics concepts to develop our argument. We consider the challenges of obtaining and interpreting trace evidence from smart devices; unpack the ways in which these devices are designed to be ‘invisible in use’; and reflect on the processes by which they become domesticated into everyday life. We also analyse the differentiated levels of control occupants have over smart home devices, and the surveillance impacts of making everyday life visible to third parties, particularly the police.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Information Systems
Reference53 articles.
1. Context-awareness in wearable and ubiquitous computing;Abowd;Virtual Reality,1998
2. Akinbi, A., & Berry, T. (2020). Forensic Investigation of Google Assistant. SN Computer Science, 1, Article number 272.
3. Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3).
4. Smart meter data privacy: A survey;Asghar;IEEE Communications Survey & Tutorials,2017
5. Exposure: Exploring the subject of surveillance;Ball;Information, Communications and Society,2009
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献