Author:
Ihrmark Daniel,Tyrkkö Jukka
Abstract
The combination of the quantitative turn in linguistics and the emergence of text analytics has created a demand for new methodological skills among linguists and data scientists. This paper introduces KNIME as a low-code programming platform for linguists interested in learning text analytic methods, while highlighting the considerations necessary from a linguistics standpoint for data scientists. Examples from an Open Educational Resource created for the DiMPAH project are used to demonstrate KNIME’s value as a low-code option for text analysis, using sentiment analysis and topic modelling as examples. The paper provides detailed step-by-step descriptions of the workflows for both methods, showcasing how these methods can be applied without writing code. The results suggest that visual or low-code programming tools are useful as an introduction for linguists and humanities scholars who wish to gain an understanding of text analytic workflows and computational thinking. However, as with more traditional programming, caution must be exercised when using methods without fully understanding them. In conclusion, KNIME is a potential avenue for innovative research and teaching computational methods to humanities scholars.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Education,Information Systems
Reference17 articles.
1. The rise of the idea of model in policymaking: The case of the British parliament, 1803–2005;Alasuutari;European Journal of Sociology,2018
2. Taylor, A., Tilton, L. (2019). New Data? The Role of Statistics in DH. In Gold, Matthew K. & Lauren F. Klein (eds.) Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019. University of Minnesota Press.
3. Demmen, J., Sankaranarayanan, R., Hartshorne-Evans, N., Semino, E. (2022). Language Matters: Representations of ‘heart failure’ in English discourse. A large-scale linguistic study. BMJ Open Heart, 9(1).
4. Gabrielator, C. (2018). Chapter 12: Keyness Analysis: nature, metrics and techniques. In Taylor, C. & Marchi, A. (eds). Corpus Approaches To Discourse: A critical review. Oxford: Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献