Multi-parametric assessment of cardiac magnetic resonance images to distinguish myocardial infarctions: A tensor-based radiomics feature

Author:

Wang Dehua1,Jasim Taher Hayder2,Al-Fatlawi Murtadha34,Abdullah Badr Ahmed5,Khayatovna Ismailova Munojat6,Abedi-Firouzjah Razzagh7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Imaging, The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang City, China

2. Department of Radiology, Hilla University College, Babylon, Iraq

3. Department of Radiological Techniques, College of Health and Medical Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babylon, Iraq

4. Shaheed Al-Muhrab Center of Cath & Cardiac Surgery’s, Babil Health Directorate, Babylon, Iraq

5. Institute of Radiology, City of Medicine Directorate, Baghdad, Iraq

6. Department of Medical Radiology, Tashkent Medical Academy, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

7. Department of Medical Physics Radiobiology and Radiation Protection, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

Abstract

AIM: This study assessed the myocardial infarction (MI) using a novel fusion approach (multi-flavored or tensor-based) of multi-parametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) at four sequences; T1-weighted (T1W) in the axial plane, sense-balanced turbo field echo (sBTFE) in the axial plane, late gadolinium enhancement of heart short axis (LGE-SA) in the sagittal plane, and four-chamber views of LGE (LGE-4CH) in the axial plane. METHODS: After considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 115 patients (83 with MI diagnosis and 32 as healthy control patients), were included in the present study. Radiomic features were extracted from the whole left ventricular myocardium (LVM). Feature selection methods were Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso), Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR), Chi-Square (Chi2), Analysis of Variance (Anova), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and SelectPersentile. The classification methods were Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and Random Forest (RF). Different metrics, including receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, F1- score, precision, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for radiomic features extracted from CMR images using stratified five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: For the MI detection, Lasso (as the feature selection) and RF/LR (as the classifiers) in sBTFE sequences had the best performance (AUC: 0.97). All features and classifiers of T1 + sBTFE sequences with the weighted method (as the fused image), had a good performance (AUC: 0.97). In addition, the results of the evaluated metrics, especially mean AUC and accuracy for all models, determined that the T1 + sBTFE-weighted fused method had strong predictive performance (AUC: 0.93±0.05; accuracy: 0.93±0.04), followed by T1 + sBTFE-PCA fused method (AUC: 0.85±0.06; accuracy: 0.84±0.06). CONCLUSION: Our selected CMRI sequences demonstrated that radiomics analysis enables to detection of MI accurately. Among the investigated sequences, the T1 + sBTFE-weighted fused method with the highest AUC and accuracy values was chosen as the best technique for MI detection.

Publisher

IOS Press

Reference32 articles.

1. Imaging techniques in the evaluation ofpost-infarction function and scar,olade Cardiología (English Edition);Pozo;{Revista Espa n,2014

2. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: revisiting an old relationship;Koliaki;Metabolism,2019

3. Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty: patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications;Bolognese;Circulation,2002

4. Use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in assessing mitral regurgitation: current evidence;Uretsky;Journal of the American College of Cardiology,2018

5. Intercellular communication in the heart: therapeutic opportunities for cardiac ischemia;Martins-Marques;Trends in Molecular Medicine,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3