The Chinese Version of UHDRS in Huntington’s Disease: Reliability and Validity Assessment

Author:

Li Xiao-Yan1,Bao Yu-Feng1,Xie Juan-Juan1,Qian Shu-Xia1,Gao Bin1,Xu Miao2,Dong Yi1,Burgunder Jean-Marc3,Wu Zhi-Ying145

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology and Department of Medical Genetics in Second Affiliated Hospital and Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China

2. Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

3. Swiss Huntington’s Disease Centre, Siloah, Gümligen and, Department of Neurology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

4. NHC and CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontier Science Center for Brain Research and Brain-Machine Integration, School of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

5. CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Scienceand Intelligence Technology, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Background: The Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) is a universal scale assessing disease severity of Huntington’s disease (HD). However, the English version cannot be widely used in China, and the reliability and validity of the Chinese UHDRS have not yet been confirmed. Objective: To test the reliability and validity of Chinse UHDRS in patients with HD. Methods: Between August 2013 and August 2021, 159 HD patients, 40 premanifest HD, and 64 healthy controls were consecutively recruited from two medical centers in China and assessed by Chinese UHDRS. Internal consistency and interrater reliability of the scale were examined. Intercorrelation was performed to analyze the convergent and divergent validity of the scale. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to explore the optimal cutoff point of each cognitive test. Results: High internal consistency was found in Chinese UHDRS, and its Cronbach’s alpha values of the motor, cognitive, behavioral and functional subscales were 0.954, 0.826, 0.804, and 0.954, respectively. The interrater reliability of the total motor score was 0.960. The convergent and divergent validity revealed that motor, cognitive and functional subscales strongly related to each other except for Problem Behavior Assessment. Furthermore, we not only provided the normal level of each cognitive test in controls, but also gave the optimal cutoff points of cognitive tests between controls and HD patients. Conclusion: We demonstrate for the first time that the translated version of UHDRS is reliable for assessing HD patients in China. This can promote the universal use of UHDRS in clinical practice.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3