Affiliation:
1. Department of Physical Therapy, Sports·Movement Artificial-Intelligence Robotics Technology (SMART) Institute, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Machine Learning and Control Systems Lab, Yonsei University, South Korea
3. Chungdam Rehabilitation Hospital Center, Seoul, South Korea
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although clinical machine learning (ML) algorithms offer promising potential in forecasting optimal stroke rehabilitation outcomes, their specific capacity to ascertain favorable outcomes and identify responders to robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in individuals with hemiparetic stroke undergoing such intervention remains unexplored. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the best predictive model based on the international classification of functioning impairment domain features (Fugl– Meyer assessment (FMA), Modified Barthel index related-gait scale (MBI), Berg balance scale (BBS)) and reveal their responsiveness to robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) in patients with subacute stroke. METHODS: Data from 187 people with subacute stroke who underwent a 12-week Walkbot RAGT intervention were obtained and analyzed. Overall, 18 potential predictors encompassed demographic characteristics and the baseline score of functional and structural features. Five predictive ML models, including decision tree, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, light gradient boosting machine, and categorical boosting, were used. RESULTS: The initial and final BBS, initial BBS, final Modified Ashworth scale, and initial MBI scores were important features, predicting functional improvements. eXtreme Gradient Boosting demonstrated superior performance compared to other models in predicting functional recovery after RAGT in patients with subacute stroke. CONCLUSION: eXtreme Gradient Boosting may be an invaluable prognostic tool, providing clinicians and caregivers with a robust framework to make precise clinical decisions regarding the identification of optimal responders and effectively pinpoint those who are most likely to derive maximum benefits from RAGT interventions.
Reference28 articles.
1. Comparison between XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost using a home credit dataset;Al Daoud,;International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering,2019
2. Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke;Blackburn,;Physical Therapy,2002
3. Prediction of discharge walking ability from initial assessment in a stroke inpatient rehabilitation facility population;Bland,;Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,2012
4. How predictive is the MMSE for cognitive performance after stroke?;Bour,;Journal of Neurology,2010
5. Inflated estimates of proportional recovery from stroke: the dangers of mathematical coupling and compression to ceiling;Bowman,;Stroke,2021