Wrist pressure and angulation during keyboarding: Comparison between two common wrist supports

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wrist pressure and angulation while working at a computer workstation have been associated with cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs) like carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). OBJECTIVE: This quantitative, comparative study analyzed wrist pressure and angulation between two common wrist supports while typing at a standardized computer workstation. METHODS: A convenience sample of healthy young adults completed a five-minute typing task at a standardized workstation with no wrist support, with the ErgoBeads™ wrist support, and with an Elzo™ (memory foam) wrist support. Pressure mapping (Tekscan™)) and goniometry were used as quantitative measures to examine wrist pressure and wrist angulation during the typing task; descriptive and inferential statistics were performed to compare wrist angulation and wrist pressure between two supports. RESULTS: For the sample (n = 54), both wrist supports demonstrated a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in wrist extension as well as pressure compared to typing at the workstation with no support. There was no statistically significant difference in peak or mean pressure between the ErgoBeads™ and Elzo™ wrist supports (p = 0.99). Significant difference was identified ((p < 0.001) for wrist angle as participants exhibited less wrist extension using the ErgoBeads™ ( x ¯ = 12 . 56 ∘ ; SD = 3.32°) support as compared to the Elzo™ ( x ¯ = 19 . 25 ∘ ; SD = 3.77°) support. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the ErgoBeads™ and Elzo™ memory foam wrist supports are effective for reducing pressure between the wrist and work surface while the ErgoBeads™ support may promote a more neutral angle of the wrist while typing.