Author:
Heidlund Marcus,Gidlund Katarina L.
Abstract
Though ‘digitalization’ has become a buzzword and policy objective in public-sector development, the struggle to grasp and define it as a modern phenomenon continues. Furthermore, research has long shown that it is difficult to extract the value with which digitalization is associated. Against this backdrop, the aim of this paper is to uncover the enactment by a specific set of actors of digitalization as production and reproduction practices. We interviewed a group of governmentally sanctioned regional digitalization coordinators to identify how digitalization was translated and implemented by the appointed professionals. We applied Orlikowski and Gash’s three levels of technology (nature, strategy, and use) and combined these with Feenberg’s matrix of four views on technology to produce an analytical framework. Our findings show that the making of digitalization can be described like ‘nailing jelly to a wall’, owing to the lack description of its capabilities and functionalities, coupled with a raison d’etre that is highly elusive beyond ‘change’, in very general terms.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Information Systems
Reference28 articles.
1. How is technology made? – That is the question;Bijker;Cambridge Journal of Economics,2010
2. Revisiting the IT productivity paradox;Brown;The American Review of Public Administration,2015
3. Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences;Cho;The Qualitative Report,2014
4. Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions;Dwivedi;Information Systems Frontiers,2015
5. eGovernment and the transformation agenda;Foley;Public Administration,2009
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献