The impact of probiotics on antibiotic resistance in newborns: A systematic review

Author:

Fernandes Matilde A.1,Delgado Lucinda2,Almeida André Coelho3

Affiliation:

1. University of Minho Medical School, Braga, Portugal

2. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira – Guimarães, Creixomil, Portugal

3. Department of Neonatology, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira – Guimarães, Creixomil, Portugal

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Newborns, particularly premature ones, are vulnerable to bacterial infections and often receive antibiotics, disrupting their normal intestinal microbiota. Probiotics have multiple health benefits and are recommended for restoring balance, but caution is needed due to potential consequences, such as promoting antibiotic resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a systematic review to assess current knowledge regarding the impact of probiotics on antibiotic resistance in newborns. METHODS: This systematic review is aligned with the PRISMA 2020 statement. The search involved three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and the keywords used were “newborn”, “probiotic”, and “antibiotic resistance”. Titles/abstracts were independently analyzed, followed by full-text assessments. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted, assessing outcomes like antibiotic resistance gene and mobile gene elements quantity and quality, vancomycin resistant enterococci colonization, antibiotic-resistant bacteria colonization, and microbiota changes. It was only included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies focusing on human newborns. RESULTS: In the study selection process, 1,970 articles were identified and six were included in this review. The results varied, with two studies suggesting a positive impact of probiotics on antibiotic resistance, one a negative impact, while three others found no significant impact. Microbiota changes were also addressed across four studies, where the findings included promotion of beneficial bacteria and reduction of potential pathogens. Bias risk was evaluated using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. CONCLUSION: Our findings did not allow for clear conclusions to be drawn, due to the observed heterogeneity between studies, highlighting the need for further studies.

Publisher

IOS Press

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3