Evitable iterates of the consistency operator

Author:

Walsh James1

Affiliation:

1. Sage School of Philosophy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

Abstract

Why are natural theories pre-well-ordered by consistency strength? In previous work, an approach to this question was proposed. This approach was inspired by Martin’s Conjecture, one of the most prominent conjectures in recursion theory. Fixing a reasonable subsystem T of arithmetic, the goal was to classify the recursive functions that are monotone with respect to the Lindenbaum algebra of T. According to an optimistic conjecture, roughly, every such function must be equivalent to an iterate Con T α of the consistency operator “in the limit” within the ultrafilter of sentences that are true in the standard model. In previous work the author established the first case of this optimistic conjecture; roughly, every recursive monotone function is either as weak as the identity operator in the limit or as strong as Con T in the limit. Yet in this note we prove that this optimistic conjecture fails already at the next step; there are recursive monotone functions that are neither as weak as Con T in the limit nor as strong as Con T 2 in the limit. In fact, for every α, we produce a function that is cofinally equivalent to Con T α yet cofinally equivalent to Con T .

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference9 articles.

1. Iterated local reflection versus iterated consistency;Beklemishev;Annals of Pure and Applied Logic,1995

2. Provability logics for natural Turing progressions of arithmetical theories;Beklemishev;Studia Logica,1991

3. Reflection principles and provability algebras in formal arithmetic;Beklemishev;Russian Mathematical Surveys,2005

4. Results on Martin’s Conjecture;Lutz;Bulletin of Symbolic Logic,2021

5. On the inevitability of the consistency operator;Montalbán;The Journal of Symbolic Logic,2019

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3