Affiliation:
1. Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
2. Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Pretoria, South Africa
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of sensory based interventions (SBI) by many parties including speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are evident despite limited proof of their efficacy. Insight into SLPs’ implementation, knowledge, and perceptions of SBI are crucial to define and guide such practices in the field of speech-language therapy. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to gather information regarding the nature of SBI, knowledge of sensory processing and SBI, and perception of the role and outcomes of SBI as implemented by SLPs. METHOD: A quantitative survey design was employed. Sixty-five SLPs working in early intervention clinics, public hospital clinics, school settings, and private practice responded to a questionnaire. Results were analysed using SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: Respondents indicated that they often implement SBI using various sensory activities and equipment. They answered more than half of the questions related to the prevalence and nature of sensory difficulties in children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder (CWASD) accurately. Respondents answered fewer questions regarding the differences between SBI and sensory integration therapy accurately. Regular collaboration with and guidance from occupational therapists (OTs) were reported. Respondents acknowledged the role of SLPs in addressing sensory difficulties in CWASD. Positive outcomes for the implementation of SBI in speech-language therapy were stated. CONCLUSION: Despite the limited evidence for the efficacy of SBI, SLPs regularly implement such practices to enhance therapy outcomes. The insights gathered from this study support reports of positive outcomes related to SBI. The need for more rigorous efficacy studies, clearer guidelines and specialised training for SLT’s in SBI are highlighted.
Reference41 articles.
1. American Psychiatric Association, DSM-5 Task Force. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5∑ (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.
2. Influence of sensory integration procedures on language development;Ayers,;American Journal of Occupational Therapy,1981
3. Baranek, G.T , Watson, L.R , Boyd, B.A , Poe, M.D. (2013) Hyporesponsiveness to social and non-social sensory stimuli in children with autism, children with developmental delays, and typically developing children, Development and Psychopathology 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412001071.
4. A systematic review of sensory-based treatments for children with disabilities;Barton,;Research in Developmental Disabilities,2015
5. Sensory-based intervention in the schools: a survey of occupational therapy practitioners;Benson,;Early Intervention,,2019