Impact of Patient Mild Cognitive Impairment on Physician Decision-Making for Treatment

Author:

Blair Emilie M.12,Zahuranec Darin B.3,Langa Kenneth M.2456,Forman Jane245,Reale Bailey K.2,Kollman Colleen7,Giordani Bruno8,Levine Deborah A.324

Affiliation:

1. University of Michigan (U-M), Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. Department of Internal Medicine and Cognitive Health Services Research Program, U-M Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

3. Department of Neurology and Stroke Program, U-M, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

4. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, U-M, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

5. VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

6. Institute for Social Research, U-M, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

7. Kollman Research Services, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

8. Department of Psychiatry and Michigan Alzheimer’s Disease Center, U-M, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Abstract

Background: Older patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) should receive evidence-based treatments when clinically indicated. However, patients with MCI appear less likely than cognitively normal patients to receive evidence-based treatments. Objective: To explore the influence of a patient’s MCI diagnosis on physician decision-making. Methods: Qualitative study of 18 physicians from cardiology, neurology, and internal medicine using semi-structured interviews. We sought to understand whether and how a patient’s having MCI has influenced physicians’ decisions about five categories of treatments or tests (surgery, invasive tests, non-invasive tests, rehabilitation, and preventive medication). We used qualitative content analysis to identify the unifying and recurrent themes. Results: Most physician participants described MCI as influencing their recommendations for at least one treatment or test. We identified two major themes as factors that influenced physician recommendations in patients with MCI: Physicians assume that MCI patients’ decreased cognitive ability will impact treatment; and physicians assume that MCI patients have poor health status and physical functioning that will impact treatment. These two themes were representative of physician beliefs that MCI patients have impaired independent decision-making, inability to adhere to treatment, inability to communicate treatment preferences, and increased risk and burden from treatment. Conclusion: A patient’s MCI diagnosis influences physician decision-making for treatment. Some physician assumptions about patients with MCI were not evidence-based. This phenomenon potentially explains why many patients with MCI get fewer effective treatments or tests than cognitively normal patients. Interventions that improve how physicians understand MCI and make decisions for treatments in patients with MCI are needed.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3