Diagnostic Performance of an Eye-Tracking Assisted Visual Inference Language Test in the Assessment of Cognitive Decline due to Alzheimer’s Disease

Author:

Belan Ariella Fornachari Ribeiro1,Pais Marcos Vasconcelos12,Camargo Marina von Zuben de Arruda1,Sant’Ana Livea Carla Fidalgo Garcêz1,Radanovic Marcia1,Forlenza Orestes Vicente1

Affiliation:

1. Laboratório de Neurociências (LIM-27), Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

2. UConn Center on Aging, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA

Abstract

Background: The assessment of language changes associated with visual search impairment can be an important diagnostic tool in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continuum. Objective: Investigate the performance of an eye-tracking assisted visual inference language task in differentiating subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia from cognitively unimpaired older adults (controls). Methods: We assessed a group of 95 older adults (49 MCI, 18 mild dementia due to AD, and 28 controls). The subjects performed the same task under multiple experimental conditions which generate correlated responses that need to be taken into account. Thus, we performed a non-parametric repeated measures ANOVA model for verbal answers, and a linear mixed model (LMM) or its generalized version for the analysis of eye tracking variables. Results: Significant differences were found in verbal answers across all diagnostic groups independently of type of inference, i.e., logic or pragmatic. Also, eye-tracking parameters were able to discriminate AD from MCI and controls. AD patients did more visits to challenge stimulus (Control-AD, –0.622, SE = 0.190, p = 0.004; MCI-AD, –0.514, SE = 0.173, p = 0.011), more visits to the correct response stimulus (Control-AD, –1.363, SE = 0.383, p = 0.002; MCI-AD, –0.946, SE = 0.349, p = 0.022), more fixations on distractors (Control-AD, –4.580, SE = 1.172, p = 0.001; MCI-AD, –2.940, SE = 1.070, p = 0.020), and a longer time to first fixation on the correct response stimulus (Control-AD, –0.622, SE = 0.190, p = 0.004; MCI-AD, –0.514, SE = 0.173, p = 0.011). Conclusion: The analysis of oculomotor behavior along with language assessment protocols may increase the sensitivity for detection of subtle deficits in the MCI-AD continuum, representing an important diagnostic tool.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3