Artificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service

Author:

Bullock Justin1,Young Matthew M.2,Wang Yi-Fan3

Affiliation:

1. Public Service and Administration Department, The Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University, Texas, TX, USA

2. Department of Public Administration and International Affairs, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA

3. School of Public Administration, University of Nebraska-Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI), discretion, and bureaucratic form in public organizations. We ask: How is the use of AI both changing and changed by the bureaucratic form of public organizations, and what effect does this have on the use of discretion? The diffusion of information and communication technologies (ICTs) has changed administrative behavior in public organizations. Recent advances in AI have led to its increasing use, but too little is known about the relationship between this distinct form of ICT and to both the exercise of discretion and bureaucratic form along the continuum from street- to system-levels. We articulate a theoretical framework that integrates work on the unique effects of AI on discretion and its relationship to task and organizational context with the theory of system-level bureaucracy. We use this framework to examine two strongly differing cases of public sector AI use: health insurance auditing, and policing. We find AI’s effect on discretion is nonlinear and nonmonotonic as a function of bureaucratic form. At the same time, the use of AI may act as an accelerant in transitioning organizations from street- and screen-level to system-level bureaucracies, even if these organizations previously resisted such changes.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Information Systems

Reference73 articles.

1. To Preempt a Thief;Andrejevic;International Journal of Communication (19328036),2017

2. A survey of medicare data processing and integration for fraud detection;Bauder;2018 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI),2018

3. Benbouzid, B. (2019). To predict and to manage. Predictive policing in the United States. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 2053951719861703.

4. Algorithmic prediction in policing: Assumptions, evaluation, and accountability;Bennett Moses;Policing and Society,2018

5. Binns, R. (2019). Human Judgement in Algorithmic Loops; Individual Justice and Automated Decision-Making. Individual Justice and Automated Decision-Making, (September 11, 2019).

Cited by 66 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3