Which factors affect the implementation of telerehabilitation? Study protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review with a framework synthesis

Author:

Jesus Tiago S.1,Kamalakannan Sureshkumar2,Bhattacharjya Sutanuka3,Bettger Janet Prvu4,Jacobs Karen5,Hoenig Helen67

Affiliation:

1. Center for Education in Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

2. Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), South Asia Centre for Disability Inclusive Development and Research (SACDIR), Indian Institute of Public Health – Hyderabad (IIPH-H), Hyderabad, India

3. Department of Occupational Therapy, Byrdine F. Lewis College of Nursing and Health Professions, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

4. School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

5. Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

6. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

7. Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telehealth approaches are promising for the delivery of rehabilitation services but may be under-used or under-implemented. OBJECTIVE: To report a review protocol to identify how much telerehabilitation (telehealth approaches to the delivery of rehabilitation services) have been used and implemented, and which factors have affected such implementation. METHODS: A mixed-methods systematic review with a framework synthesis. Six databases for the scientific literature will be searched, complemented by snowballing searches and additional references coming from key informants (i.e., rehabilitation researchers from a networking group in health services research). We will include English-language empirical research examining the routine use or implementation of telehealth technologies in physical rehabilitation services or by physical rehabilitation professionals from a range of study designs, excepting case studies, case reports, and qualitative studies with n < 5. Two independent reviewers will perform the screenings, quality appraisals (using the Joanna Briggs Institutes’ appraisal checklists), and the data extractions. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will be used to synthesize the data on the enablers and barriers of the implementation of telerehabilitation approaches. All the authors will be involved at this synthesis, and key informants will provide feedback. CONCLUSION: The results can inform further implementation endeavours.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Rehabilitation

Reference69 articles.

1. Telehealth in Occupational Therapy;American Occupational Therapy Association;The American journal of occupational therapy: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association,2018

2. Telehealth in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review;Tenforde;PM & R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation,2017

3. Tele-Rehabilitation after Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature;Sarfo;Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: the official journal of National Stroke Association,2018

4. Telehealth pulmonary rehabilitation: A review of the literature and an example of a nationwide initiative to improve the accessibility of pulmonary rehabilitation;Selzler;Chron Respir Dis,2018

5. Telerehabilitation services for stroke;Laver;The Cochrane database of systematic reviews,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3