Author:
Afzal* Muhammad Waqar,Ahmad Ashfaq,Gilani Syed Amir,Zulfaqar Nimra,Fatima Sahar,Mahmmod Tahir
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Translation and validation of important scales in other languages reduce bias in reporting the functional status of the patient. OBJECTIVE: To translate the Back Pain Functional Scale into Urdu (BPFSu), adapt it for use in other cultures, and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHOD: According to Beaton guidelines, translation and cultural adaption was carried out. On 100 Urdu-literate men and women aged 18–60 years with lower back pain, the final BPFSu was assessed for psychometric qualities. First at baseline and again after 7 days, participants completed the BPFSu, the Functional Rating Index (FRI), and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). RESULTS: Internal consistency of the BPFSu was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.937). No floor and ceiling effects were found Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.882, CI 95%; 0.830–0.919) was achieved. Spearman correlation coefficient showed criterion validity with the NPRS (rho =â0.701, p⩽ 0.001) and Pearson correlation coefficient showed construct validity with the FRI (r=â0.740, p⩽ 0.001). The minimum detectable changes were 9.96, while the standard error of measurement was 3.6. CONCLUSION: The BPFSu is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing physical function in individuals experiencing low back discomfort.
Reference31 articles.
1. The epidemiology of neck pain;Hoy;Best Pact Res Clin Rheumatol,2010
2. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain;Koes;BMJ,2006
3. Opioids for low back pain;Deyo;BMJ,2015
4. Emergency department use in the country’s five most populous states and the total United States, 2012;Hing;NCHS Data Brief,2016
5. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain;Andersson;Lancet,1999