Author:
Safi Samir K.,Sanusi Olajide Idris
Abstract
The Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model seems not to easily capture the nonlinear patterns exhibited by the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in terms of daily confirmed cases. As a result, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Error, Trend, and Seasonality (ETS) modeling have been successfully applied to resolve problems with nonlinear estimation. Our research suggests that it would be ideal to use a single model of ETS or ARIMA for COVID-19 time series forecasting rather than a complicated Hybrid model that combines several models. We compare the forecasting performance of these models using real, worldwide, daily COVID-19 data for the period between January 22, 2020 till June 19, and June 20 till January 2, 2021 which marks two stages, each stage indicating the first and the second wave respectively. We discuss various forecasting approaches and the criteria for choosing the best forecasting technique. The best forecasting model selected was compared using the forecasting assessment criterion known as Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The empirical results show that the ETS and ARIMA models outperform the ANN and Hybrid models. The main finding from the ETS and ARIMA models analysis indicate that the magnitude of the increase in total confirmed cases over time is declining and the percentage change in the death rate is also on the decline. Our results shows that the chosen forecaste models are consistent during the first and second wave of of the pandemic. These forecasts are encouraging as the world struggles to contain the spread of COVID-19. This may be the result of the social distancing measures mandated by governments worldwide.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Modeling and Simulation,Statistics and Probability
Reference20 articles.
1. Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. Springer Science & Business Media, 30.
2. Application of the ARIMA model on the COVID-2019 epidemic dataset;Benvenuto;Data in Brief,2020
3. Cryer, J., & Chan, K. (2008). Time series analysis with applications in R. Springer, New York.
4. Hyndman, R. J. (2004). New in Forecast 4.0. http://robjhyndman.com/hyndsight/forecast4/.
5. Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). Forecasting: Principles and practice. OTexts.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献