Consumer and Healthcare Professional Led Priority Setting for Quality Use of Medicines in People with Dementia: Gathering Unanswered Research Questions

Author:

Reeve Emily123,Chenoweth Lynn4,Sawan Mouna35,Nguyen Tuan Anh1678,Kalisch Ellett Lisa1,Gilmartin-Thomas Julia91011,Tan Edwin5,Sluggett Janet K.312,Quirke Lyntara S.13,Tran Kham1678,Ailabouni Nagham114,Cowan Katherine15,Sinclair Ron13,de la Perrelle Lenore1617,Deimel Judy18,To Josephine19,Daly Stephanie2021,Whitehead Craig22,Hilmer Sarah N.23

Affiliation:

1. Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, SA, Australia

2. Geriatric Medicine Research, Faculty of Medicine and College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada

3. Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

4. Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia

5. School of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

6. National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia

7. School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

8. Health Strategy and Policy Institute, Ministry of Health of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam

9. Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

10. School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

11. Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), Melbourne, VIC, Australia

12. UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

13. Consumer advocate, Dementia Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia

14. Pharmacy Australia Centre of Excellence, Health and Behavioural Science Department, School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

15. James Lind Alliance, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

16. College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, SA, Australia

17. College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

18. Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN) Memory Service, Adelaide, SA, Australia

19. Division of Aged Care, Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Northern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia

20. Family Health Medical Group, Adelaide, SA, Australia

21. Sensus Cognition, Adelaide, SA, Australia

22. Division of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia

23. Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Background: Historically, research questions have been posed by the pharmaceutical industry or researchers, with little involvement of consumers and healthcare professionals. Objective: To determine what questions about medicine use are important to people living with dementia and their care team and whether they have been previously answered by research. Methods: The James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership process was followed. A national Australian qualitative survey on medicine use in people living with dementia was conducted with consumers (people living with dementia and their carers including family, and friends) and healthcare professionals. Survey findings were supplemented with key informant interviews and relevant published documents (identified by the research team). Conventional content analysis was used to generate summary questions. Finally, evidence checking was conducted to determine if the summary questions were ‘unanswered’. Results: A total of 545 questions were submitted by 228 survey participants (151 consumers and 77 healthcare professionals). Eight interviews were conducted with key informants and four relevant published documents were identified and reviewed. Overall, analysis resulted in 68 research questions, grouped into 13 themes. Themes with the greatest number of questions were related to co-morbidities, adverse drug reactions, treatment of dementia, and polypharmacy. Evidence checking resulted in 67 unanswered questions. Conclusion: A wide variety of unanswered research questions were identified. Addressing unanswered research questions identified by consumers and healthcare professionals through this process will ensure that areas of priority are targeted in future research to achieve optimal health outcomes through quality use of medicines.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference42 articles.

1. Evans I , Thornton H , Chalmers I , Glasziou P (2011) Testing Treatments: Better Research for Better Healthcare, Pinter and Martin, London.

2. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer;Tallon;Lancet,2000

3. Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: There is an important mismatch;Crowe;Res Involv Engagem,2015

4. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence;Chalmers;Lancet,2009

5. Making patient relevant clinical research a reality;Crowe;BMJ,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3