Affiliation:
1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
2. Department of Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
3. Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Aqaba University of Technology, Aqaba, Jordan
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive inflammatory and autoimmune neurological disease caused by inflammation and demyelination of the central nervous system. Pain is a typical symptom of central nervous system demyelination, affecting 63% of adults with MS. Recently, the role of non-pharmacological pain management in patients is growing because the non-pharmacological interventions are considered safe, affordable, easy, and accessible. However, to date, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses have comprehensively examined the therapeutic effects of the variety of non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions in the management of pain in patients with MS. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of the non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions in pain management in patients with MS. METHODS: A comprehensive search using PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct databases was performed and included all randomized controlled trials, randomized cross-over trials, and quasi-experimental trials assessing the effect of non-pharmacological interventions for managing pain in patients with MS. This study was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines of a systematic review and pair-wise meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were performed by calculating the standardized mean difference at a 95% confidence interval using Review Manager software. RESULTS: Twenty-nine papers were included in the systematic review, and only 22 of them were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed a significant effect of neuromodulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on pain intensity reduction in patients with MS (SMD –0.51, 95% CI –0.51 to –0.09, P = 0.02), (SMD –0.67, 95% CI –1.18 to –0.16 P = 0.01), respectively. The analysis showed significant improvement in pain intensity in patient with MS after mind-body therapies (SMD –0.45, 95% CI –0.82 to –0.7, P = 0.02), mindfulness (SMD –0.55, 95% CI –0.96 to –0.14, P = 0.009), hypnosis (SMD –0.88, 95% CI –1.30 to –0.46, P = 0.0001), trigger point therapies (SMD –0.83, 95% CI –1.65 to –0.01, P = 0.05) and cognitive behavioral therapy (SMD –0.64, 95% CI –1.18 to –0.11, P = 0.02). However, there is no significant effect of relaxation therapy on pain reduction in patients with MS (SMD –0.82, 95% CI –1.94 to 0.31, P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the majority of the non-pharmacological rehabilitation interventions showed potential therapeutic effects in reducing pain intensity in patients with MS.
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation