Frameworks used in cluttering treatments: Past, present, and future

Author:

Duchan Judith Felson1

Affiliation:

1. State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This integrative review is of two literatures on cluttering treatments. It integrates into those two reviews a third literature to show an alternative way for cluttering to be treated in the future. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to encourage professionals involved in treating those who clutter to reflect on how conceptual frameworks can affect their treatment choices. METHODS: Works from three literatures on interventions are examined. Literatures covering two historic periods of cluttering treatments are compared to one another and to a third literature that offers an alternative framework for working with those who clutter. RESULTS: Treatment approaches to cluttering have almost universally focused on remediating impairments associated with the disorder. This impairment focus flows from a medical model –a model that views cluttering as a disease, located in the person, in need of remediation. An alternative framework, called the social model, one that focuses on the social conditions surrounding cluttering, is reviewed for its applicability to cluttering therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The medical model, used by authors since cluttering first appeared in the literature, carries within it assumptions about the selection and sequencing of clinical goals aimed at reducing cluttering symptoms. The social model alternative would likely shift the focus to working on ways for promoting the life participation of those who clutter. The applicability of social model practices to the treatment of cluttering is explored and encouraged.

Publisher

IOS Press

Reference42 articles.

1. Bailey, K. , Harris, J. , & Simpson, S. (2014). Stammering and the social model of disability: Challenge and opportunity. [Conference presentation] The 10th Oxford Dysfluency Conference, Oxford, United Kingdom.

2. Barton, L. (Ed.). (1996). Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights. Longman Publishing.

3. A historical perspective of the popular use ofelectric and magnetic therapy;Basford,;Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,2001

4. Cluttering;Coen,;The Voice, (trans.),1885

5. Craig, A. (2010). The importance of conducting controlled clinical trials in the fluency disorders with emphasis on cluttering. In K. Bakker, I. Raphael & F. Myers (eds.) Proceedings of the First World Conference in Cluttering. Katarino, Bulgaria (pp. 220–229).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3