Epidural spinal cord stimulation for motor recovery in spinal cord injury: A systematic review

Author:

McHugh Conor1,Taylor Clare1,Mockler David2,Fleming Neil1

Affiliation:

1. Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

2. John Stearne Medical Library, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, School of Medicine, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidural spinal cord stimulation (ESCS) emerged as a technology for eliciting motor function in the 1990’s and was subsequently employed therapeutically in the population with spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite a considerable number of ESCS studies, a comprehensive systematic review of ESCS remains unpublished. OBJECTIVE: The current review of the existing literature evaluated the efficacy of ESCS for improving motor function in individuals with SCI. METHODS: A search for ESCS studies was performed using the following databases: Medline (Ovid), Web of Science and Embase. Furthermore, to maximize results, an inverse manual search of references cited by identified articles was also performed. Studies published between January 1995 and June 2020 were included. The search was constructed around the following key terms: Spinal cord stimulation, SCI and motor response generation. RESULTS: A total of 3435 articles were initially screened, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria. The total sample comprised of 24 participants with SCI. All studies reported some measure of improvement in motor activity with ESCS, with 17 reporting altered EMG responses. Functional improvements were reported in stepping (n = 11) or muscle force (n = 4). Only 5 studies assessed ASIA scale pre- and post-intervention, documenting improved classification in 4 of 11 participants. Appraisal using the modified Downs and Black quality checklist determined that reviewed studies were of poor quality. Due to heterogeneity of outcome measures utilized in studies reviewed, a meta-analysis of data was not possible. CONCLUSION: While the basic science is encouraging, the therapeutic efficacy of ESCS remains inconclusive.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Clinical Neurology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference59 articles.

1. Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: Recent assessments and recommendations for future directions;Alexander,;Spinal Cord,2009

2. Traumatic spinal cord injury: An overview of pathophysiology, models and acute injury mechanisms;Alizadeh,;Frontiers in Neurology,2019

3. Recovery of over-ground walking after chronic motor complete spinal cord injury;Angeli,;New England Journal of Medicine,2018

4. Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans;Angeli,;Brain,2014

5. Basmajian, J. V. , & De Luca, C. J. (1985). Muscles alive: Their functions revealed by electromyography. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3