Abstract
The rapid expansion of new Information and Communication Technologies has improved the possibilities for surveillance, rendering modern society a ‘surveillance society’ (Lyon, 2006). Surveillance practices today comprise a myriad of actors. However, relations between different groups of “observers” and “observed” and their respective impact on the form of surveillance are not yet sufficiently considered. Furthermore, methodologies are missing “to look beyond abstract theory” (Galič et al., 2017, p. 34). This paper proposes theoretical considerations as well as a methodological framework by taking a meso-level perspective and by incorporating the examination of power relations in surveillance systems. It is argued that contemporary surveillance structures encompass hierarchies, albeit not in a traditional unidirectional manner. Furthermore, a first attempt is made to provide a methodological framework that helps to analyse the power relationships between diverse actors that emerge due to differences in capabilities to observe and hide. Based on a number of specified indicators, the framework aims to assist in understanding how power is distributed and in how far actors and their position within the hierarchy determine the form of surveillance and the impact it can take.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Information Systems
Reference17 articles.
1. Allen, M. (1994). ‘See you in the city!’ Perth’s Citiplace and the space of surveillance. In Gibson, K., & Watson, S. (eds.). Metropolis Now: Planning and the Urban in Contemporary Australia. Australia: Pluto Press, pp. 137–147.
2. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon;Boyd;Information, Communication & Society,2012
3. Information technology and dataveillance;Clarke;Communications of the ACM,1988
4. Clarke, R. (1993). The digital persona and its application to dataveillance. The Information Society, 10(2).
5. Cox, R.W. (1993). Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. In Gill, S. Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. pp. 49–66.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献