Comparing employment, employment services, and employment goals in propensity-matched samples of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities with and without autism

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) tend to have poor employment outcomes relative to the general population, as do people with autism. Research is unclear, however, about how people with IDD with and without autism compare on a variety of employment-related indicators, including desire to work, having work as a goal in their service plans, and being employed. OBJECTIVE: To understand how people with IDD with and without autism compare on important employment-related outcomes, based on a matched random sample. METHODS: Using merged administrative datasets, we used propensity score matching to construct statistically proximate samples of Medicaid waiver users in a single state with IDD both with and without autism, and then tested differences between the two groups on important employment-related indicators. RESULTS: People with IDD and autism were less likely than people with IDD alone to have a goal for employment in their individualized service plans and to hold employment in group community settings. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of desire to have a job or employment in individual community settings. CONCLUSION: Results reinforce the importance of planning for employment if holding employment is a person’s aim, regardless of the presence of autism.