Quality of teaching in Kosovo’s higher education institutions: Viewpoints of institutional leaders and lecturers1

Author:

Sokoli Dugagjin1,Trunk Širca Nada2,Koren Andrej2

Affiliation:

1. University of Business and Technology, Prishtina, Kosovo

2. International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the continuous shift being experienced in the higher education landscape, the quality of teaching had become an issue to be discussed from different perspectives by the concerned stakeholders. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the research on the quality of teaching and identify the characteristics and best practices on supporting, developing, and improving Kosovo’s higher educational system’s effectiveness by improving the quality of teaching. METHODS: The paper used qualitative paradigms in research. The study targeted professors at Kosovo universities from two public universities and two private Colleges where focus group interviews, individual interviews, and documentation content analysis were obtained. RESULTS: According to professors’ opinions, the research results show that the quality of teaching is related to the research of professors, and it depends on the experience of the teacher, knowledge transfer, technology use, and degree of professor qualification. Other key factors determining the teaching quality are communication, motivation, pedagogy, cooperation, and adequate implementation of planned activities. CONCLUSIONS: Kosovo should establish appropriate mechanisms and policies for evaluating professors’ performance and make their selection and re-election based on these performance indicators and not only based on formal documents.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference40 articles.

1. The Impact of Private Provision of Public Education: Empirical Evidence from Bogota’s Concession Schools;Barrera-Osorio;World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 4121,2006

2. Early impact and outcomes of an institutionally aligned, student focused learning perspective on teaching quality assurance;Barrie;Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,2005

3. Whatever happened to peer review? Revitalizing the contribution of tutors to course evaluation;Bingham;Higher Education Research & Development,2001

4. Measuring University Quality;Brooks;The Review of Higher Education,2005

5. The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning;Biggs;Higher Education,2001

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3