Examining barriers and strategies for effective professional or interagency collaboration in secondary transition

Author:

Magee Elizabeth1,Plotner Anthony1

Affiliation:

1. Educational Studies Department, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For young adults with disabilities, post-high school outcomes in employment, higher education, and independent living are markedly worse than for peers without disabilities. As a result, legislation and research aimed at supporting transitioning students with disabilities has increased. Further, numerous initiatives that better support youth and families have been implemented at the state and local level. Collaboration within and across service delivery systems has been identified as a critical aspect of transition planning and supports; however, evidence-based research related to the implementation and effects of collaborative partnerships is limited. OBJECTIVE: In the current study, we identify transition professionals’ perceptions of collaborative factors that facilitate and inhibit collaboration. METHOD: This study utilizes a single-state survey research design to examine the viewpoints of people in transition professions, specifically educators, Vocational Rehabilitation professionals, and community supports providers. RESULTS: Variances in perceptions were found among participant role groups. Specifically, educators as a whole report that time and workload barriers affect their ability to collaborate effectively. Further, findings indicate that ensuring individual collaborative team member responsibility is perceived as an effective strategy. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may be applied to technical assistance providers when developing team-level evaluations to monitor current levels and support needs of collaborative transition planning teams.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Occupational Therapy,Rehabilitation

Reference29 articles.

1. Practical considerationsfor using exploratory factor analysis in educational research;Beavers,;Research, and Evaluation,2013

2. Improving collaboration between schools and vocationalrehabilitation: Stakeholder identified barriers and strategies;Benz,;Career Development for Exceptional Individuals,1995

3. Brown, I , Wehmeyer, M. L , Webb, K. W , & Seabrooks-Blackmore, J. (2017) The transition from school to adult life. In M. L.Wehmeyer, I. Brown, M. Percy, K. A. Shogren, & W. L. A. Fung, (Eds.) A Comprehensive Guide to Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 541-555). Brookes Publishing.

4. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests;Cronbach,;Psychometrika,1951

5. Dillman, D. (1978) Telephone and mail surveys: The total design method. John Wiley.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3