Affiliation:
1. Department of Practical Philosophy, University of Helsinki, Finland
Abstract
My concern is the preservation of rationally justifiable moral practices, which face challenges because of the increasing integration of social robots into roles previously occupied exclusively by persons. I will focus on the attribution of responsibility and blaming as examples of such practices. I will argue that blaming robots (a) does not satisfy the rational constraints on the reactive attitude of blame and other related reactive attitudes and practices such as resentment, forgiving, and punishment, and (b) is by itself morally wrong.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. What is conceptual disruption?;Ethics and Information Technology;2024-03
2. 3. Social Robots and Society;Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies;2023-09-05
3. Are we justified attributing a mistake in diagnosis to an AI diagnostic system?;AI and Ethics;2022-08-09
4. Humans, Neanderthals, robots and rights;Ethics and Information Technology;2022-08-08
5. Robot Responsibility and Moral Community;Frontiers in Robotics and AI;2021-11-22