Affiliation:
1. SINTEF AS, Norway. E-mails: dumitru.roman@sintef.no, brian.elvesater@sintef.no, BjornMarius.vonZernichow@sintef.no
2. Ontotext, Bulgaria. E-mails: vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com, boyan.simeonov@ontotext.com
3. SpazioDati, Italy. E-mail: paniagua@spaziodati.eu
4. OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway. E-mail: ahmet.soylu@oslomet.no
5. OpenCorporates, UK. E-mail: chris.taggart@opencorporates.com
Abstract
Company data, ranging from basic company information such as company name(s) and incorporation date to complex balance sheets and personal data about directors and shareholders, are the foundation that many data value chains depend upon in various sectors (e.g., business information, marketing and sales, etc.). Company data becomes a valuable asset when data is collected and integrated from a variety of sources, both authoritative (e.g., national business registers) and non-authoritative (e.g., company websites). Company data integration is however a difficult task primarily due to the heterogeneity and complexity of company data, and the lack of generally agreed upon semantic descriptions of the concepts in this domain. In this article, we introduce the euBusinessGraph ontology as a lightweight mechanism for harmonising company data for the purpose of aggregating, linking, provisioning and analysing basic company data. The article provides an overview of the related work, ontology scope, ontology development process, explanations of core concepts and relationships, and the implementation of the ontology. Furthermore, we present scenarios where the ontology was used, among others, for publishing company data (business knowledge graph) and for comparing data from various company data providers. The euBusinessGraph ontology serves as an asset not only for enabling various tasks related to company data but also on which various extensions can be built upon.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems
Reference30 articles.
1. V. Alexiev, A. Kiryakov and P. Tarkalanov, euBusinessGraph: Company and economic data for innovative products and services, in: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Semantic Systems (Semantics 2017), 2017. http://rawgit2.com/webdata/SEMANTiCS2017-posters/master/papers_final/163_Alexiev/index.html.
2. Key choices in the design of simple knowledge organization system (SKOS);Baker;Journal of Web Semantics,2013
3. Integrating big data: A semantic extract-transform-load framework;Bansal;IEEE Computer,2015
4. J. Barzdins, K. Cerans, R. Liepins and A. Sprogis, Advanced ontology visualization with OWLGrEd, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED 2011), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 796, CEUR-WS.org, 2011. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-796/owled2011_submission_7.pdf.
5. The financial industry business ontology: Best practice for big data;Bennett;Journal of Banking Regulation,2013
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献