Percentile Rankings and Position Differences for Absolute and Allometrically Scaled Performance Measures From the National Football League Scouting Combine

Author:

Gillen Zachary M.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi

Abstract

Abstract Gillen, ZM. Percentile rankings and position differences for absolute and allometrically scaled performance measures from the National Football League scouting combine. J Strength Cond Res 37(12): e613–e624, 2023—This study aimed to provide percentile rankings for absolute and allometrically scaled performance measures for National Football League (NFL) Scouting Combine subjects and determine if allometric scaling affected position-specific differences in performance measures. Subjects included American football players (n = 3,015) who participated in the NFL Scouting Combines between 2015 and 2019. Subjects were divided into position groups: defensive backs (DBs, n = 562), defensive linemen (DL, n = 498), linebackers (LBs, n = 395), offensive linemen (OL, n = 505), running backs (RBs, n = 303), tight ends (TEs, n = 165), quarterbacks (QBs, n = 165), and wide receivers (WRs, n = 422). Performance measures included 40-yd dash time (with 10- and 20-yd split times), bench press repetitions to failure, vertical jump height, broad jump distance, pro-agility time, and L-cone drill time. Descriptive statistics were computed for all performance metrics and allometrically scaled performance metrics. One-way analyses of variance tested for position group differences for absolute and allometrically scaled performance measures. Percentile rankings for absolute and allometrically scaled performance measures were determined. Position-specific differences for absolute performance measures indicated that DB and WR tended to be faster, jump higher and further, and have greater change-of-direction capabilities compared with LB, QB, RB, and TE, who scored better in these respects than OL and DL. Allometric scaling revealed that DL, LB, RB, and TE tended to have superior performance than DB and WR, with QB and OL having the poorest performance. This study provides percentile rankings and the equation and parameters by which coaches and practitioners may allometrically scale data for evaluations of normalized performance measures from the NFL Scouting Combine.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3