Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Different Technologies for Sprint-Derived Horizontal Force-Velocity-Power Profiling

Author:

Cormier Patrick123ORCID,Tsai Ming-Chang1,Meylan César134,Agar-Newman Dana12,Epp-Stobbe Amarah1,Kalthoff Zach1,Klimstra Marc12

Affiliation:

1. Canadian Sport Institute Pacific, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada;

2. Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada;

3. Physical Performance Department, Canada Soccer, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and

4. School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Cormier, P, Tsai, M-C, Meylan, C, Agar-Newman, D, Epp-Stobbe, A, Kalthoff, Z, and Klimstra, M. Concurrent validity and reliability of different technologies for sprint-derived horizontal force-velocity-power profiling. J Strength Cond Res 37(6): 1298–1305, 2023—This study evaluated the validity and reliability of common systems to assess sprint-derived horizontal force-velocity-power (FVP H ) profile metrics. Two double constellation athlete monitoring systems (STATSports Apex, Catapult Vector S7) and one timing gate system were compared with a radar gun for the computation of FVP H metrics. Intersystem validity was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Pearson's correlation coefficients (R 2 ), and Bland-Altman plots with absolute and percent agreement. Intrasystem reliability was assessed with agreement bias and ICC. STATSports demonstrated moderate agreement for F 0, P max, τ, and D rf (8.62, 6.46, -9.81, and 9.96%, respectively) and good agreement for V 0 and MSS (−2.18 and −1.62%). Catapult displayed good agreement across all metrics (F 0, V 0, P max, MSS, τ, and D rf: −0.96, −0.89, −1.85, −0.84, 0.38, and −0.27%, respectively). Timing gates demonstrated good agreement with V 0 and MSS (−2.62 and −1.71%) and poor agreement with F 0, P max, τ, and D rf (19.17, 16.64, −20.49, and 20.18%, respectively). Intrasystem reliability demonstrated good agreement (<2% bias) with very large to near-perfect ICC (0.84–0.99) for Catapult and STATSports systems. Overall, GPS/GNSS 10 Hz technology is reliable across devices and can provide moderate-to-good accuracy of FVP H metrics in single maximal effort sprints. However, Catapult provided better agreement for more FVP H metrics than STATSports, which may be related to differences in proprietary algorithms. Also, modeling timing gate data using current FVP H profiling techniques results in poor bias that requires greater investigation. GPS/GNSS data can be used for FVP H profiling, which could inform performance and rehabilitation processes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3