Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology for assessing the level of economic security of innovative enterprises based on the use of taxonomic analysis of the main indicators of their institutional support for the optimal organization of management and forecasting the economic development of the regions of their operation. The method proposed in the article consists in assessing the system of indicators of institutional support for innovative entrepreneurship within the framework of the Institute of Human Capital, the Institute of Financial and Credit Component, the Institute for the Implementation of Innovations in Industry, the Institute of Export Activities, the Institute of Intellectual Property, the Institute of Infrastructure Support, the Institute of Regulatory and Legal Support, the Institute of Public-Private Partnership and Mediation, the Institute of Information Support. The advantage of this technique over the methods for assessing economic security proposed in other scientific works is that the summary assessment indicator is universal and its interpretation makes it possible to identify the relationship between the main integrated indicators for all regions of the studied country, taking into account the unevenness of their economic development, as well as to analyze the question of the causal nature of the transformation of the institutional environment and its consequent. The practical significance of systematized indicators of institutional support, influencing the modeling of economic security management of innovative entrepreneurship, is that they can be used in forecasting the economic development of regions of the country and developing appropriate measures to regulate this process.
Publisher
International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences
Reference20 articles.
1. Barczyk J, Musiał W, and Žukovskis J (2019). The barriers and opportunities to the development of small business in rural areas. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 41(1): 114-126.
2. Chopin P, Blazy JM, Guindé L, Tournebize R, and Doré T (2017). A novel approach for assessing the contribution of agricultural systems to the sustainable development of regions with multi-scale indicators: Application to Guadeloupe. Land Use Policy, 62: 132-142.
3. Diaz RA (2011). Planning for sustainable development: Strategic alignment in Peruvian regions and cities. Futures, 43(8): 908-918.
4. Ferjencik M (2020). Practical safety management for small or medium enterprises. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 68: 104281.
5. Hnatenko I (2020). Formation of state priorities of business development in the conditions of innovative economy. Ph.D. Dissertation, National Academy of Management, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献