Improving continence in children and young people with neurodisability: a systematic review and survey

Author:

Eke Helen1ORCID,Hunt Harriet2ORCID,Ball Susan34ORCID,Rogers Morwenna24ORCID,Whear Rebecca24ORCID,Allinson Annette1ORCID,Melluish Julia1ORCID,Lindsay Claire5ORCID,Richardson Davina6ORCID,Rogers June6ORCID,Hutton Eve7ORCID,Madden Nicholas8ORCID,Wright Anne9ORCID,Anderson Rob2ORCID,Logan Stuart14ORCID,Thompson Coon Jo24ORCID,Morris Christopher14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Peninsula Childhood Disability Research Unit (PenCRU), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

2. Evidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement (ESMI), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

3. Health Statistics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

4. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula (PenARC), Exeter, UK

5. Paediatric Bladder and Bowel Care Team, Northern Devon Healthcare NHS Trust, Exeter, UK

6. Bladder & Bowel UK, Disabled Living, Manchester, UK

7. School of Allied Health Professions, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK

8. Children's Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

9. Evelina London Children’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Background Children and young people with neurodisability often need help to achieve socially acceptable bladder and bowel control. Approaches vary depending on whether or not the impairment results from spinal cord pathology that impairs motor control and sensation of the bladder and bowel. Currently, there is uncertainty about which interventions are effective. Objective The objective was to summarise the available evidence on and current practice for improving continence in children and young people with neurodisability. Design A systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and factors that modify intervention implementation, alongside a cross-sectional, online survey of current practice with health professionals, parent carers, school and care staff and young people with neurodisability. Results Twelve databases were searched in the review, resulting in 5756 references; 71 studies (72 papers) were included in the analyses. Most of the evidence was for children with spinal cord pathology, which involved evaluations of pharmacological approaches and surgical techniques, whereas the evidence pertaining to those with non-spinal-cord-related pathology tended to be for behavioural interventions. The methodological quality of studies was rated as being moderate to poor. There were three robust qualitative studies about the experience of continence among children with spinal cord pathology. We found substantial heterogeneity across the interventions that we evaluated in terms of quality, study design and outcomes measured. No economic studies were found. The results were synthesised narratively and reported in text and tables. We did not find any eligible studies evaluating interventions using toilet and clothing adaptations in the review, although the survey highlighted that these types of interventions are frequently used and considered. In total, 949 people responded to the survey: 202 health professionals, 605 parent carers, 122 school and social care staff, and 20 young people. The survey results illustrated the different roles that professionals have in improving continence, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to supporting children and young people and their families. Clinicians employ a range of assessments and interventions to improve continence or independent toileting, depending on the needs of the child. Limitations Quantitative studies in the review were not methodologically robust. The survey had a risk of response bias. Conclusions Our research found a dearth of good-quality evidence for many of the interventions currently in use, and no evidence of experiences of implementing interventions for children with non-spinal-cord-related pathology. There was also no evidence of cost-effectiveness of any of the interventions. Future work There is a need to involve young people and families in the design of high-quality evaluative research for interventions that aim to improve continence. This is especially the case for children with autism and learning disability, who have been neglected in previous evaluative and qualitative research. We recommend better training for health, education and care professionals about toileting, informed by evidence and the lived experiences of children and their families. We recommend a joined-up multidisciplinary and holistic approach to improving continence to maximise independence, dignity and comfort. It is vital that children and young people with neurodisability have early access to regular, integrated assessment of their bladder and bowel health, and are fully supported with appropriate personalised treatment. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018100572. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 73. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health Research

Subject

Health Policy

Reference145 articles.

1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

2. Towards a definition of neurodisability: a Delphi survey;Morris;Dev Med Child Neurol,2013

3. Conduct disorder, enuresis and specific developmental delays in two types of encopresis: a case-note study of 63 boys;Foreman;Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry,1996

4. Developmental history and neurological findings in enuretic children;Järvelin;Dev Med Child Neurol,1989

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3