Patient and carer access to medicines at end of life: the ActMed mixed-methods study

Author:

Latter Sue1ORCID,Campling Natasha1ORCID,Birtwistle Jacqueline2ORCID,Richardson Alison13ORCID,Bennett Michael I2ORCID,Meads David4ORCID,Blenkinsopp Alison5ORCID,Breen Liz5ORCID,Edwards Zoe2ORCID,Sloan Claire4ORCID,Miller Elizabeth67ORCID,Ewings Sean8ORCID,Santer Miriam9ORCID,Roberts Lesley10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

2. Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

3. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK

4. Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

5. School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK

6. Pharmacy, St Luke’s Hospice, Sheffield, UK

7. Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK

8. Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

9. School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

10. Patient and public involvement representative, Staffordshire, UK

Abstract

Background Patient access to medicines at home during the last 12 months of life is critical for effective symptom control, prevention of distress and unplanned admission to hospital. The limited evidence suggested problems with different components of service delivery and, to the best of our knowledge, the impact of innovations in end-of-life service delivery has remained unevaluated. Objective To provide an evaluation of patient and carer access to medicines at end of life within the context of models of service delivery. Design and data sources The study used a multiphase mixed-methods design, comprising (1) a systematic literature review; (2) an online questionnaire survey of health-care professionals delivering end-of-life care; (3) evaluative mixed-method case studies of service delivery models, including cost and cost-effectiveness analysis; (4) interviews with community pharmacists and pharmaceutical wholesalers and distributors; and (5) an expert consensus-building workshop. Setting Community and primary care end-of-life services in England. Participants Health-care professionals delivering end-of-life care and patients living at home in the last 12 months of life and their carers. Results A systematic review identified a lack of evidence on service delivery models and patient experiences of accessing medicines at end of life. A total of 1327 health-care professionals completed an online survey. The findings showed that general practitioners remain a predominant route for patients to access prescriptions, but nurses and primary care-based pharmacists are also actively contributing. However, only 42% of clinical nurse specialists and 27% of community nurses were trained as prescribers. The majority (58%) of prescribing nurses and pharmacists did not have access to an electronic prescribing system. Health-care professionals’ satisfaction with access to shared patient records to facilitate medicines access was low, with 39% of health-care professionals either not at all or only slightly satisfied. Respondents perceived that there would be a significant improvement in pain control if access to medicines was greater. Case studies (n = 4) highlighted differences in speed and ease of access to medicines between service delivery models. Health-care professionals’ co-ordination facilitated the access process. The work of co-ordination was frequently burdensome, for example because general practitioner services were hard to access or because the stock of community pharmacy medicines was unreliable. Prescription cost differentials between services were substantial when accounting for the eligible population over the medium term. The supply chain generally ensured stocks of palliative medicines, but this was underpinned by onerous work by community pharmacists navigating multiple complex systems and wholesaler interfaces. Limitations Patient records lacked sufficient detail for timelines to be constructed. Commissioners of community pharmacy services and wholesalers and distributors were difficult to recruit. Conclusions Accessing medicines required considerable co-ordination work. Delays in access were linked to service delivery models that were over-reliant on general practitioners prescribing, unreliable stocks of community pharmacy medicines and clinical nurse specialists’ lack of access to electronic prescribing. Key issues were relationships and team integration, diversifying the prescriber workforce, access to shared records and improved community pharmacy stock. Future work Further research should consider policy and practice action for nursing and pharmacy services to fulfil their potential to help patients access medicines, together with attention to improving co-ordination and shared electronic records across professional service interfaces. Study registration This study is registered as CRD42017083563 and the trial is registered as ISRCTN12762104. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 10, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Funder

Health and Social Care Delivery Research (HSDR) Programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Managing medication at the end of life: supporting family carers;British Journal of Community Nursing;2023-01-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3