Text messaging and financial incentives to encourage weight loss in men with obesity: the Game of Stones feasibility RCT

Author:

Dombrowski Stephan U12ORCID,McDonald Matthew3ORCID,van der Pol Marjon4ORCID,Grindle Mark5ORCID,Avenell Alison6ORCID,Carroll Paula7ORCID,Calveley Eileen3ORCID,Elders Andrew8ORCID,Glennie Nicola3ORCID,Gray Cindy M9ORCID,Harris Fiona M3ORCID,Hapca Adrian10ORCID,Jones Claire11ORCID,Kee Frank12ORCID,McKinley Michelle C13ORCID,Skinner Rebecca2ORCID,Tod Martin14ORCID,Hoddinott Pat3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada

2. Division of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

3. Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

4. Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

5. Division of Rural Health and Wellbeing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK

6. Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

7. Men’s Health Forum in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

8. Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK

9. Institute of Health & Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

10. Tayside Clinical Trials Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

11. Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

12. Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK

13. Institute for Global Food Security, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK

14. Men’s Health Forum, London, UK

Abstract

Background In 2016, 26% of UK men were estimated to be obese. Systematic reviews suggest that few men engage in formal weight loss interventions that support weight reduction and improve health. Objective To co-produce, with patient and public involvement, an acceptable and feasible randomised controlled trial design to test a men-only weight management intervention. Design This was a two-phase feasibility study. Phase 1 was the development of intervention components, study procedures and materials including a discrete choice experiment with survey questions. Phase 2 was an individually randomised three-arm feasibility trial over 12 months. Qualitative interviews were conducted at 3 and 12 months. Setting The setting was two sites in Scotland that had disadvantaged urban and rural areas and differed in employment levels and ethnic groups. Participants In phase 1, 1045 men with obesity were recruited by Ipsos MORI (London, UK; www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk) to represent the UK population. In phase 2, 105 men with obesity were recruited in the community or through general practice obesity registers. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 50 men at 3 months and with 33 men at 12 months. Interventions The trial arms were narrative short message service (SMS) for 12 months (SMS only), financial endowment incentive informed by loss aversion and linked to achievement of weight loss targets plus narrative SMS for 12 months (SMS + I), and waiting list control group for 12 months followed by 3 months of an alternative SMS style developed based on feedback from men who had received the narrative SMS (control). Main outcome measures The main outcome measures were acceptability and feasibility of recruitment, retention, engagement, intervention components and trial procedures. Outcomes were assessed by examining procedural, quantitative and qualitative data at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results The most acceptable incentive strategy, based on the discrete choice experiment results, was to verify weight loss of 5% at 3 months, verify weight loss of 10% at 6 months and maintain weight loss of 10% at 12 months. Overall, 105 men with obesity from across the socioeconomic spectrum were successfully recruited to target, 59% of whom lived in more disadvantaged areas. Retention at 12 months was acceptable (74%) and was higher among individuals from disadvantaged areas. Narrative SMS were acceptable to many men, with a minority reporting negative reactions. Incentives were acceptable but were not the primary motivation for behaviour change. Twelve men in the incentive arm (33%) secured at least some money and three (8%) secured the full amount. Both intervention arms lost some weight, with greater weight loss in the arm that received SMS and incentives. The alternative SMS based on men’s feedback received no strong negative reactions. Limitations Fewer participants from the SMS + I arm (64%) completed the study at 12 months than did those in the SMS-only (79%) and control (83%) arms. The reasons for this difference were complex. Conclusions The men-only weight management intervention consisting of narrative SMS and financial incentives was acceptable and feasible, meeting the progression criteria for a full trial. Tailoring of SMS may improve acceptability and retention. Future work Minor refinements to the intervention components based on the study findings will be made prior to testing in a multisite definitive randomised controlled trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03040518. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 8, No. 11. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Funder

Public Health Research programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health Research

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,Pharmaceutical Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3