A systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and barriers to implementation of thrombolytic and neuroprotective therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in the NHS-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A systematic review of the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and barriers to implementation of thrombolytic and neuroprotective therapy for acute ischaemic stroke in the NHS

Published:2002 Issue:26 Volume:6 Page:
ISSN:1366-5278
Container-title:Health Technology Assessment
language:en
Short-container-title:Health Technol Assess

Author:

Sandercock P.¹,Berge E.²,Dennis M.¹,Forbes J.³,Hand P.¹,Kwan J.¹,Lewis S.¹,Lindley R.¹,Neilson A.⁴,Thomas B.¹,Wardlaw J.¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Ulleval Hospital, Oslo, Norway

3. Department of Public Health, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland

4. HealthEcon, Basel, Switzerland

Funder

Health Technology Assessment programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health Research

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Modeling the potential efficiency of a blood biomarker-based tool to guide pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy in stroke patients;The European Journal of Health Economics;2022-07-27

2. Secondary transfer of emergency stroke patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy by air in rural England: economic evaluation and considerations;Emergency Medicine Journal;2020-11-10

3. Cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy between 6 and 24 hours in acute ischemic stroke;International Journal of Stroke;2019-02-13

4. Specific treatment of acute ischemic stroke;Warlow's Stroke;2019-01-28

5. Routine low-dose continuous or nocturnal oxygen for people with acute stroke: three-arm Stroke Oxygen Supplementation RCT;Health Technology Assessment;2018-03