Enablers and barriers to engaging under-served groups in research: Survey of the United Kingdom research professional’s views

Author:

Coe DorothyORCID,Bigirumurame TheophileORCID,Burgess Meera,Rouse JohnORCID,Wroe Caroline

Abstract

Background There is a known lack of diversity in research subject populations. This impacts on the generalisability of findings and effects clinician prescribing. In the United Kingdom those who are underrepresented are thought of as under-served by the research community. They are commonly those affected by health inequality and disparity. Works illustrate the complexity of the issue covering demographic, social, economic and illness factors which contribute to being under-served and strategies to improve engagement. The survey aim was to explore the views of research professionals in the UK. Methods Research professionals were invited to complete an online survey. The findings were analysed using statistical and qualitative methods to identify the enablers and barriers to engagement of under-served groups in research. Descriptive statistics were utilised with associations compared univariately using chi-square test and logistic regression for multivariable analysis. Results A total of 945 completed responses were received. Those identified as under-served agrees with the previous literature with a broader descriptor of ethnic and cultural minorities and the addition of adolescents and young adults. Language and literacy skills have the most impact on being under-served. Only 13% of respondents said they felt equipped to meet the needs of the under-served. The main strategy to increase diversity was community engagement and the movement of research delivery into the community. The largest barriers were funding and time. Training needs identified were linked to community engagement, cultural competence and consent processes. Conclusions The UK findings reflect the previous USA literature. Adolescents and young people are added to the groups identified as under-served. Enablers included community outreach and improvement to communication. Barriers were time, funding, organisational processes and lack of focus. Issues were identified with translation and interpretation services. Training requirements focus on methodologies and methods to engage and the consent of those from under-served groups.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3