The consultation open and close study: A feasibility study of a complex intervention

Author:

Murphy MaireadORCID,Scott Anne,Wong GeoffORCID,Walter Scott,Hancock JudeORCID,Palmer TomORCID,Salisbury ChrisORCID

Abstract

Background: Use of telephone, video and online consultations in general practice is increasing. This can lead to transactional consultations which make it harder for patients to describe how symptoms affect their lives, and confusion about plans for future care. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of a randomised control trial (RCT) for a complex intervention designed to address patients’ concerns more comprehensively and help them remember advice from general practitioners (GPs). Methods: The complex intervention used two technologies: a patient-completed pre-consultation form at consultation opening and a doctor-provided summary report printed or texted at consultation closure. The feasibility of the intervention was tested in a cluster-randomised framework in six practices: four randomised to intervention, and two to control. Thirty patients were recruited per practice. Quantitative data was collected via patient-reported questionnaires and health records. GPs, patients and administrators were interviewed. Analysis included a process evaluation, recruitment and follow-up rates, and data completeness to assess feasibility of a future RCT. ResultsThe intervention was acceptable and useful to patients and GPs, but the process for the pre-consultation form required too much support from the researchers for a trial to be feasible. Both technologies were useful for different types of patients. Recruitment rates were high (n=194) but so was attrition, therefore criteria to progress to an RCT were not met. Conclusions: Both the pre-consultation form and the summary report showed important potential benefits. They should be considered as separate interventions and evaluated independently. The technology to send pre-consultation forms needs further development to allow integration with GP computer systems. The additional time needed to generate summary reports meant GPs preferred to use it selectively. Collecting outcome data using online questionnaires was efficient but associated with high attrition, so alternative approaches are needed before a full RCT is feasible.

Funder

Research for Patient Benefit Programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Reference77 articles.

1. Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved?;M Marvel;JAMA.,1999

2. Teachers’ and Students’ Handbook for Consultation Skills Teaching.;A Hay,2014

3. The national evaluation of NHS walk-in centres.;C Salisbury,2002

4. The potential of alternatives to face-to-face consultation in general practice, and the impact on different patient groups: a mixed-methods case study.;H Atherton,2018

5. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2016.;L Curtis,2016

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3