Metformin in non-diabetic hyperglycaemia: the GLINT feasibility RCT

Author:

Griffin Simon J12ORCID,Bethel M Angelyn3ORCID,Holman Rury R3ORCID,Khunti Kamlesh4ORCID,Wareham Nicholas1ORCID,Brierley Gwen1ORCID,Davies Melanie4ORCID,Dymond Andrew1ORCID,Eichenberger Rose1ORCID,Evans Philip5ORCID,Gray Alastair6ORCID,Greaves Colin5ORCID,Harrington Kyla4ORCID,Hitman Graham7ORCID,Irving Greg2ORCID,Lessels Sarah3ORCID,Millward Ann5ORCID,Petrie John R8ORCID,Rutter Martin9ORCID,Sampson Mike1011ORCID,Sattar Naveed8ORCID,Sharp Stephen1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

2. Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

3. Diabetes Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

4. Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

5. University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK

6. Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

7. Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

8. Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

9. Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

10. Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

11. Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and General Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK

Abstract

BackgroundThe treatment of people with diabetes with metformin can reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) and may reduce the risk of cancer. However, it is unknown whether or not metformin can reduce the risk of these outcomes in people with elevated blood glucose levels below the threshold for diabetes [i.e. non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH)].ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility of the Glucose Lowering In Non-diabetic hyperglycaemia Trial (GLINT) and to estimate the key parameters to inform the design of the full trial. These parameters include the recruitment strategy, randomisation, electronic data capture, postal drug distribution, retention, study medication adherence, safety monitoring and remote collection of outcome data.DesignA multicentre, individually randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, pragmatic, primary prevention trial. Participants were individually randomised on a 1 : 1 basis, blocked within each site.SettingGeneral practices and clinical research facilities in Cambridgeshire, Norfolk and Leicestershire.ParticipantsMales and females aged ≥ 40 years with NDH who had a high risk of CVD.InterventionsProlonged-release metformin (500 mg) (Glucophage®SR, Merck KGaA, Bedfont Cross, Middlesex, UK) or the matched placebo, up to three tablets per day, distributed by post.Main outcome measuresRecruitment rates; adherence to study medication; laboratory results at baseline and 3 and 6 months; reliability and acceptability of study drug delivery; questionnaire return rates; and quality of life.ResultsWe sent 5251 invitations, with 511 individuals consenting to participate. Of these, 249 were eligible and were randomised between March and November 2015 (125 to the metformin group and 124 to the placebo group). Participants were followed up for 0.99 years [standard deviation (SD) 0.30 years]. The use of electronic medical records to identify potentially eligible individuals in individual practices was resource intensive. Participants were generally elderly [mean age 70 years (SD 6.7 years)], overweight [mean body mass index 30.1 kg/m2(SD 4.5 kg/m2)] and male (88%), and the mean modelled 10-year CVD risk was 28.8% (SD 8.5%). Randomisation, postal delivery of the study drug and outcome assessment using registers/medical records were feasible and acceptable to participants. Most participants were able to take three tablets per day, but premature discontinuation of the study drug was common (≈30% of participants by 6 months), although there were no differences between the groups. All randomised participants returned questionnaires at baseline and 67% of participants returned questionnaires by the end of the study. There was no between-group difference in Short Form questionnaire-8 items or EuroQol-5 Dimensions scores. Compared with placebo, metformin was associated with small improvements in the mean glycated haemoglobin level [–0.82 mmol/mol, 95% confidence interval (CI) –1.39 to –0.24 mmol/mol], mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (2.31 ml/minute/1.73 m2, 95% CI –0.2 to 4.81 ml/minute/1.73 m2) and mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (–0.11 mmol/l, 95% CI –0.25 to 0.02 mmol/l) and a reduction in mean plasma vitamin B12level (–16.4 ng/l, 95% CI –32.9 to –0.01 ng/l). There were 35 serious adverse events (13 in the placebo group, 22 in the metformin group), with none deemed to be treatment related.LimitationsChanges to sponsorship reduced the study duration, the limited availability of information in medical records reduced recruitment efficiency and discontinuation of study medication exceeded forecasts.ConclusionsA large, pragmatic trial comparing the effects of prolonged-release metformin and placebo on the risk of CVD events is potentially feasible. However, changes to the study design and conduct are recommended to enable an efficient scaling up of the trial. Recommendations include changing the inclusion criteria to recruit people with pre-existing CVD to increase the recruitment and event rates, using large primary/secondary care databases to increase recruitment rates, conducting follow-up remotely to improve efficiency and including a run-in period prior to randomisation to optimise trial adherence.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN34875079.FundingThe project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Merck KGaA provided metformin and matching placebo.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment programme

Merck KGaA

Publisher

National Institute for Health Research

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3