An Occupational Therapy intervention for residents with stroke-related disabilities in UK Care Homes (OTCH): cluster randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation

Author:

Sackley Catherine M1,Walker Marion F2,Burton Christopher R3,Watkins Caroline L4,Mant Jonathan5,Roalfe Andrea K6,Wheatley Keith7,Sheehan Bart8,Sharp Leslie9,Stant Katie E6,Fletcher-Smith Joanna2,Steel Kerry10,Barton Garry R911,Irvine Lisa9,Peryer Guy9,

Affiliation:

1. Academic Department of Physiotherapy, School of Bioscience Education, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK

2. Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

3. School of Healthcare Sciences, Bangor University, Gwynedd, UK

4. School of Health, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK

5. Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

6. Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

7. Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

8. Directorate of Acute Medicine and Rehabilitation, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

9. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

10. Occupational Therapy, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

11. Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

Abstract

BackgroundCare home residents with stroke-related disabilities have significant activity limitations. Phase II trial results suggested a potential benefit of occupational therapy (OT) in maintaining residents’ capacity to engage in functional activity.ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a targeted course of OT in maintaining functional activity and reducing further health risks from inactivity for UK care home residents living with stroke-related disabilities.DesignPragmatic, parallel-group, cluster randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. Cluster randomisation occurred at the care-home level. Homes were stratified according to trial administrative centre and type of care provided (nursing or residential), and they were randomised 1 : 1 to either the intervention or the control arm.SettingThe setting was 228 care homes which were local to 11 trial administrative centres across England and Wales.ParticipantsCare home residents with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, including residents with communication and cognitive impairments, not receiving end-of-life care.InterventionPersonalised 3-month course of OT delivered by qualified therapists. Care workers participated in training workshops to support personal activities of daily living. The control condition consisted of usual care for residents.Main outcome measuresOutcome data were collected by a blinded assessor. The primary outcome at the participant level was the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living (BI) score at 3 months. The secondary outcomes included BI scores at 6 and 12 months post randomisation, and the Rivermead Mobility Index, Geriatric Depression Scale-15 and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, three levels, questionnaire scores at all time points. Economic evaluation examined the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain. Costs were estimated from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services.ResultsOverall, 568 residents from 114 care homes were allocated to the intervention arm and 474 residents from another 114 care homes were allocated to the control arm, giving a total of 1042 participants. Randomisation occurred between May 2010 and March 2012. The mean age of participants was 82.9 years, and 665 (64%) were female. No adverse events attributable to the intervention were recorded. Of the 1042 participants, 870 (83%) were included in the analysis of the primary outcome (intervention,n = 479; control,n = 391). The primary outcome showed no significant differences between groups. The adjusted mean difference in the BI score between groups was 0.19 points higher in the intervention arm [95% confidence interval (CI) –0.33 to 0.70,p = 0.48; adjusted intracluster correlation coefficient 0.09]. Secondary outcome measures showed no significant differences at all time points. Mean incremental cost of the Occupational Therapy intervention for residents with stroke living in UK Care Homes intervention was £438.78 (95% CI –£3360.89 to £1238.46) and the incremental QALY gain was 0.009 (95% CI –0.030 to 0.048).LimitationsA large proportion of participants with very severe activity-based limitations and cognitive impairment may have limited capacity to engage in therapy.ConclusionA 3-month individualised course of OT showed no benefit in maintaining functional activity in an older care home population with stroke-related disabilities.Future workThere is an urgent need to reduce health-related complications caused by inactivity and to provide an enabling built environment within care homes.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN00757750.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 15. See the Health Technology Assessment programme website for further project information.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health Research

Subject

Health Policy

Reference114 articles.

1. Office for National Statistics 2006-based national population projections for the UK and constituent countries;Bray;Popul Trends,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3